Slick (1969) - Thief River Falls, Minnesota, USA - FEB 8, 2005
1.2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20
Just plain bad,Decent golden color,little to no head with a poor aroma of Very faint malt some corniness and a little bit of some hop,but very little.The taste was pretty watery and plain with a thin taste of Malt and corn with a bit of hops thrown in to break up the monoteny.It’s a brew for the Lawnmower but little else.Needs a try atleast once.
Prostman (1077) - Pennsylvania, USA - DEC 31, 2004
1.5 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
This was not a bad beer for the price...but then again, $10 a case isn’t really breaking the bank. Looks to be the last beer I rate in 2004...time to move into 2005!
jde123 (775) - Washington, Washington DC, USA - OCT 21, 2004
0.7 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 2/20
Wow, this is terrible. I am shocked at how bad beer can taste. Truly, truly terrible.
DocLock (10205) - Lower Pottsgrove, Pennsylvania, USA - JUL 15, 2004
0.7 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 2/20
Another piss poor low carb beer. This one is largely indistinguishable from the other low carb monstrosities I’ve had...maybe a tad more flavor.