overall
38
99
style
RATINGS: 18   MEAN: 2.98/5.0   WEIGHTED AVG: 2.92/5   ABV: -
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
Mississippi Mud Lager Beer is a delightfully refreshing example of a traditional style lager beer. Mississippi Mud Lager displays a significant hop aroma and the long lagering period adds a smoothness that makes this beer a perfect accompaniment to any meal or enjoyed alone.

Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5


2.3
Panzuriel (2306) - Westerville, Ohio, USA - APR 2, 2003
Yellow beer with a standard fizzy rapidly disappearing head. Good solid lager nose with a nice flavor of malts. Rather run of the mill though with good finish.

2.5
3fourths (9349) - Boulder, Colorado, USA - FEB 5, 2003
UPDATED: JAN 19, 2014 Standard lager. Thank you for telling me it was "lager beer". Bottle is a gimmick, makes it stand out among the rest, but the beer itself does not. Aroma of alcohol, hops, and malt. Flavor slightly bitter, mild on the tongue, with nothing very distinctive about it.

3.5
Andrew196 (1922) - Katy, Texas, USA - AUG 14, 2002
This is a pretty solid lager. Clean crisp taste, notes of hops throughout. It was good, but it didnt really grab me (not many lagers have though). A top choice on a hot day. Cool bottle too.

3.4
Gusler (2653) - Tucson, Arizona, USA - JUL 26, 2002
Pretty fair ’Lager’. Malt nose, dark amber color, decent head and some lace. Clean and fresh, with some hop presence, and a somewhat dry finish. Quite a nice bottle as all the ladies at work wanted an ’MT’ for display. Their Black and Tan is a pretty fair brew also. Both beers fall in the ’Drinkable’ category, good not great.

3.2
austinpowers (2831) - San Francisco, California, USA - MAY 14, 2002
Strangely, the ’Mississippi Brewing Company’ is located in Utica, NY. Hoppy taste, rather sweet. Alcohol flava sort of bums me out. Not like other lagers. Much maltier. Mega-malty nose.

3.8
twocycle99 (61) - Cherry Hill, New Jersey, USA - MAR 26, 2002
Good flavor, strong hops aftertaste........................................

3.4
SudsMaster (68) - Denville, New Jersey, USA - MAR 3, 2002
Not a bad lager, good balance of malt and hops, slightly sweet. Like the black and tan better though.

3.3
prpplague (247) - Euless, Texas, USA - OCT 12, 2001
nice flavor, with a nice hoppy after taste..................................

2.8
21iceman40 (1735) - Grafton, Wisconsin, USA - SEP 3, 2001
Not bad and not great. Plain flavor and really cool bottle..................

2.8
BeerLimey (2154) - California, USA - MAY 24, 2001
Malty, fairly soft and sharp with a slightly dry bitter finish. Feel more like an amber.


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page  1  2 
Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5