overall
6
66
style
Brewed by Moosehead Brewery
Style: Pale Lager
Saint John, Canada

bottling
unknown

on tap
available

Broad Distribution

Add Distribution Data
RATINGS: 1352   WEIGHTED AVG: 2.24/5   EST. CALORIES: 150   ABV: 5%
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
A smooth clean-tasting lager that offers a good balance between malt sweetness and hop bitterness

A tick is a star rating
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5


4.1
Prostman (1077) - Pennsylvania, USA - SEP 24, 2002
Tried this beer last summer in St. John overlooking the brewery. Very crisp and clean lager, but Moosehead in the states is nowhere near as fresh

2.5
KingPinHead (390) - Des Moines, Washington, USA - SEP 23, 2002
Slight sweetness to otherwise neutral aroma. Color pale gold with standard white head. Flavor has more discernible sweet malt base than say, Molson, which also shows up in the finish...Hops are there but nothing to write home about, and works in concert with moderate carbonation to provide bite. Body a tad thin but nothing offensive in the balance. Overall, a thoroughly drinkable offering, but nothing to distinguish it (especially at a premium macro price) from the other leaders in the macro-lager pack.

3.6
Keoni99 (5) - Columbia, South Carolina, USA - SEP 21, 2002 does not count
Compared to the American Beers, this wins hands down. It deserves it's rankings in the top of American Standard Beers. My only complaint is the slight aftertaste. ** After I redrank the beer again later, I must say it does have a watery taste. I drank it after Icehouse the first time... nuff said.

2
morty99 (371) - Maryland, USA - SEP 19, 2002
..................................................

1.7
Dave420 (55) - O.C, California, USA - SEP 18, 2002
ewww damn if i could give it a less score i would... this beer is the nastiest beer i ever tasted ... aroma is alright but shit i dont know how to explin its horrible taste.. ill take ay malt liqer over this crap anyday re rate: haha it was actually that bad, maybe it was like 6 years old cuz i had som of these the other night an its not that bad... kindalike rolling rock but less of a chemical flavor and more of a fresh water flavor .. its ok

1.3
damirvrkic (56) - Franklin ACT, AUSTRALIA - SEP 17, 2002
Very light in colour and body. Flavour is very minimal and bland (Where's the malt). Very boring beer but if it was a hot stinking day and dying of thirst, then I would drink it.

1.6
radiomgb (2838) - Peterborough, Ontario, CANADA - SEP 17, 2002
Gold colour, thin, bland, and watery........................................

2.2
dhurtubise (568) - Hamilton, Ontario, CANADA - SEP 10, 2002
If you like a moose label on a green bottle and looking for yellow fizzy tastless beer that can be distinguished only by the package. Then this is your beer!

2.3
PorterPounder (8284) - Tallahassee, Florida, USA - SEP 7, 2002
UPDATED: AUG 25, 2005 RerateLight, thin watery appearance, pithy head; bland aroma, slight bit of honey in the flavor, drinkable. Original 2.4 Just your ordinary Canadian lager - a notch above the American standards. Detected a slight malty flavor as it made its way down my throat. Nothing offensive here or nothing to write home about.

3.7
OldJack99 (114) - USA - SEP 3, 2002
good & simple clean tasting beer. I'll buy em' again sometime. .......


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page  1 « 119 120 121  122  123 124 125 » 143
A tick is a star rating
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5