overall
42
46
style

bottling
unknown

on tap
unknown

distribution
unknown

Add Distribution Data
RATINGS: 30   MEAN: 2.98/5.0   WEIGHTED AVG: 2.94/5   ABV: -
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
Amber American Pale Ale brewed in New York. Lots of typical ale characteristics; fruity, dry and hoppy. A quality brew. Formerly known as New Amsterdam New York Ale.

New description: each limited production of our single batch ale has to taste just right because we do not cross blend batches like other brewers. enjoy our ale which is both brewed and dry hopped with hand selected cascade hop flowers.

Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5


4
mike mcneil (660) - St Augustine, Florida, USA - OCT 30, 2000
Another quality NA product. The appearance, aroma and taste all deliver here. Rich, dry and clean with lots of crystal malt and hops in nose and palate. All factors extremely well balanced.

4
karl (158) - Glendale, New York, USA - NOV 18, 2000
..................................................

3.8
Slipstream (2678) - USA - OCT 20, 2009
This was a favorite of mine back in the 1980s, one of the first microbrews I can remember trying. It was popular for a few years, but then the quality declined, and it began to disappear from the refrigerators of New York City corner stores. I am not sure where this resurrection is coming from (the label looks a little different from the one I recall), but I welcome it, because this is a good brew, and it deserves a higher rating. Fruity, fully hopped ale aroma. Dark amber pour with an impressive head. The taste is dry, a little sharp, and well hopped, with some nice esters. This is a fine brew, very much in the tradition of the New Amsterdam that I remember.

3.6
PhillyBeer2112 (2884) - Oviedo, Florida, USA - MAY 29, 2001
Nice and smooth. Crisply hoppy in the APA style. Very easy drinking and refreshing.

3.3
prpplague (247) - Euless, Texas, USA - MAY 18, 2002
nice aroma, clear amber/brown color, good clean taste, but the finish is of a strange hop flavor.

3.2
austinpowers (2832) - San Francisco, California, USA - JUN 6, 2002
A decent, but not great ale. Oddly, their ale is lighter in color than their Amber Lager. It's very lightly hopped and is an easy brew to drink. Uneventful.

3.2
crazyvin (2026) - New York, USA - JAN 26, 2009
labeled as single batch pale ale. A decent amber ale, a nice amber body that did not have much of a head. Aroma had big pine notes snf dome caramel notes, but mostly hops. Flavor was good but one dementional hop flavor with some caramel notes. A smooth but very thin finish. A good session beer.

3.2
elihapa (1554) - Honolulu, Hawaii, USA - MAY 9, 2009
Bottle. Pours hazel brown with a medium white head. Aroma of caramel malt and toasted wood. Palate is average. Primary flavors lean heavily towards burnt malt, emphasizing roasty flavors that are matched with a semi-sweet body. Bold, flavorful brew that reminded me of Bass Ale.

3.1
hopscotch (11182) - Vero Beach, Florida, USA - SEP 12, 2002
The commercial description will have to suffice. No time to write. It IS a quality brew. I don't highly recommend this ale over many others. Mine was bottled under the name of Campaign Ale, Election '96. Donkey and Elephant on the label. Kinda cool. Kept the bottle. The beer is kinda forgettable. Try a Tahoe Red instead.

3.1
Aurelius (5499) - Tallahassee, Florida, USA - FEB 27, 2003
Woody. Slightly tart but has a general mellow presentation. Tinny on the lips. Buttery palate with a long bitter finish. This got better as it warmed. Orange-amber with clean green and gold label.


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page    1  2 3
Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5