overall
3
38
style
RATINGS: 51   WEIGHTED AVG: 1.98/5   EST. CALORIES: 150   ABV: 5%
No commercial description

Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5


1.4
luttonm (6150) - Seattle, Washington, USA - MAR 2, 2017
Can in Lima, Peru. Almost no head, weak pale lager body. Sour, disgusting grain on nose. A bit fizzy, oddly sweet-sour body. A hint of the offensive I must say. It is not abhorrent but I have no desire to finish more than a few sips of this.

1.7
heavy (2817) - Split, CROATIA - AUG 23, 2016
A 0.33 l can, thanks Marko! It poured a lighter golden body with a small head atop. Grainy, hay and dusty aroma. Flavor was maybe vaguely sweet, with hay, and very dusty. Medium bodied, while its finish was shorter to moderate, still very dusty with lightly cooked corn or similar note. Unimpressive.

2.3
Marko (5593) - Split / Zagreb, CROATIA - AUG 19, 2016
Can from a Feniks supermarket in Split. I see what they did there. Shared with heavy. Poured a pale golden body with a tiny, lasting white head. Sweet grainy aroma, mild müsli. Clean sweetish malty taste, light vegetables. As boring as a beer can be.

2.5
vipinvelp (4366) - Velp, NETHERLANDS - MAY 1, 2016
Typical looks, aoma and taste for a mass poduced lager beer sold in warm countries. But because it is a warm country, still doale. (Malta 201604)

2.1
dwyerpg (6045) - Las Vegas, Nevada, USA - MAR 11, 2016
Picked up at a supermarket in Panama City, Panama. This is basically comparable to the better macro lagers that they have here. Nothing special

1.6
caribou43 (989) - Lausanne/Sevilla/Lima, SWITZERLAND - FEB 28, 2016
It is an eternal boring lager. The appereance is yellow-gold, normal white foam, average carbonation. The taste is too sweet and metalic and watery, not enjoyable at all and the hop doesn’t exist. I drank this beer in Lima after to watch a soccer game.

1.6
3fourths (9331) - Boulder, Colorado, USA - FEB 17, 2016
This is one of the odd imported industrial lagers sold in some supermercados in Costa Rica. The aroma is saccharine-like (nutrisweet) with quiet dirty notes of cosmetics and grime, and DMS becomes more apparent as it warms. It’s medium-light bodied and lightly sweet with low bitterness, and the malt does contribute some richness to the body. Limp and quick carbonation froth is followed by a syrupiness and more of that fruity-cosmetics dirtiness in the finish.

1.8
MohaBeer (279) - Lima, PERU - NOV 10, 2015
Dorado con transparencia, buena espuma sin retención. DMS, grano, diacetilo, malta maltoso bajo, lúpulo nulo, ligera oxidación. En boca lúpulo de amargor moderado bajo, malta maltoso bajo, lúpulo herbal bajo, oxidación, DMS. Final fresco maltoso bajo, cuerpo bajo, baja carbonatación.

1.4
TorbenJensen (1517) - Valby, DENMARK - OCT 9, 2015
The foam is fine by pouring and has a reasonable usual lager aroma. The taste is, as expected, not particularly exciting for the type. It is an ordinary usual and slightly dull lager which really might as well have a Heineken, Carlsberg or other commierciel label printed. Perhaps the slightly less carbonated than the aforementioned, but not something that is worth noting. As cold thirst quencher is quite good.

1.9
AlfredoGarcia (287) - Santiago, CHILE - APR 6, 2015
500 ml can. Grass smell, nasty. Amber color with a white low head. Decent pattern. Tasted better than expected. Kind of sweet, but with a terrible metallic aftertaste. Supermarket lagers are the worst thing that have happened to humankind. Imagine a world with the same amout of beer, but without supermarket lagers. That’s paradise, men.


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page    1  2 3 4 5 6
Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5