motelpogo (7705) - Plzen, CZECH REPUBLIC - DEC 5, 2004
0.5 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
on tap at the pyramid alehouse. one of the worst beers i have ever tasted. only 3 discernible flavours - raw sugar and compost and metho. felt a little ill after tasting this. ghastly
Ubiquibeer (140) - Cleveland, USA - SEP 10, 2004
1.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
No NO NOOOO. This is NOT a Tripel. Really really sweet with over ripe fruit and tangy syrupy off balance mouth feel. As it warmed it became very cloying and irritating to me. Not a good example of a tripel for somebody who really doesn’t like them very often anyway.
JoeMcPhee (9408) - Toronto, ON, Ontario, CANADA - JUN 26, 2004
1.9 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Very pale, almost colourless beer with a thin white head. Candi sugar, apple, and some lemon are present. Flavour is similar, but very thin bodied and a huge amount of ethanol taste completely ruin the balance. Not enough malt and way too much sugar. I’d skip this one.
duff (5484) - Copenhagen, DENMARK - JUN 17, 2004
0.9 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
Alehouse. My god, you never want to have this beer. This was some sort of special beer they were doing when we were down at the alehouse. My advice would be to stick to the lighter styles these guys do. This was almost undrinakble. Belgian yeast, super sweet malt/candy sugar? Brandy and rotten apples (i mean really rotten).