overall
1
1
style
RATINGS: 110   WEIGHTED AVG: 1.78/5   EST. CALORIES: 162   ABV: 5.4%
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
Is a smooth, slightly sweet, very drinkable lager.

Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5


0.8
   AROMA 1/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 2/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 1/20
DocLock (10205) - Lower Pottsgrove, Pennsylvania, USA - JUL 9, 2004
I give this one bonus points for color, slight flavor, and slightly better than water palate, but thats it. Red wolves are almost extinct in this country, and thats probably because rednecks are drinking this shit, getting drunk, and then going out and poaching them.

0.5
   AROMA 1/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 1/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 1/20
REDDOGICE (243) - nantucket, Massachusetts, USA - JUL 7, 2004
It lacks taste.... and taste is crucial to a beer. its an amber that is nothing to write home about.

1.8
   AROMA 2/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 7/20
mohawksin (187) - Nebraska, USA - JUN 19, 2004
I enjoy my reds. This is one of the lower end ones. It lacked that toasted flavor I was hoping for. Very nice color, but you should expect more than just color from your reds.

2.1
   AROMA 2/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 7/20
RichJ7 (1175) - Cullman, Alabama, USA - MAY 11, 2004
As many have said, not bad for a Bud product. I used to get these for $1 at a bar near my apartment in college. Clean taste, with more body than your average domestic. Havent seen one in years, but then again, I havent been looking. Not bad, though.

1.6
   AROMA 2/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 5/20
darkerdabetter (255) - Michigan, USA - MAY 10, 2004
Not a good red. It looked good, tried it when it first came out. Perhaps I should give it another chance some time, but theres plenty other beers to sample first....

2.1
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 8/20
zathrus13 (1769) - Mount Laurel, New Jersey, USA - MAY 7, 2004
For a Bud product, its not too bad. A bit malty with a nice amber color. This would be one to drink if you had to drink Bud.

5
   AROMA 10/10   APPEARANCE 5/5   TASTE 10/10   PALATE 5/5   OVERALL 20/20
1REDWOLFPLEEZ (1) - NAS LEMOORE, California, USA - APR 29, 2004 does not count
Love Red wolf!!! Gotta Have more. It was the fisrt type of amber ale I drank when iI turned 21.

0.8
   AROMA 2/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 1/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 2/20
firemedic713 (169) - Palm Bay, Florida, USA - FEB 16, 2004
Rice hop beer. Tried to be a good Red. This beer has little to offer in terms of taste and quality.

0.7
   AROMA 1/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 2/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 2/20
rabuc (143) - carlisle, Pennsylvania, USA - JAN 16, 2004
in order to submit a taste test, well, i tasted this one and wow....believe it or not - it's pretty bad. how does this brewery stay in business??? stay away from this beer.

1.7
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 4/20
mkobes (2142) - paramus, New Jersey, USA - OCT 20, 2003
Its a smooth lager. Its drinkable. Dark in color. Slightly sweet flavor. I like it.


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page  1 2 3 4 5  6  7 8 9 10 11
Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5