overall
3
38
style
RATINGS: 1886   WEIGHTED AVG: 1.98/5   EST. CALORIES: 135   ABV: 4.5%
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
Ingredients: Water, malt, rice, hops, corn, brewers yeast.
From the glass lined tanks of Old Latrobe we tender this premium beer for your enjoyment, as a tribute to your good taste. It comes from the mountain springs to you.

Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5


0.8
   AROMA 1/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 2/20
mchinn (22) - Orlando, Florida, USA - JAN 31, 2002
My roommate in college lived on this stuff. I tell ya, it has the most unique taste out of all the gross beers, but I could only take it once in a while or if there was nothing left in the refrigerator.

2.9
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 12/20
greystreet80 (191) - Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA - JAN 29, 2002
A little disapointing, kind of a womans beer. Not enough flavor for me.

1.7
   AROMA 2/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 9/20
Ringo (963) - Loveland, Colorado, USA - JAN 28, 2002
Once you get past the cool bottle and the beers cult status, its actually not very good. If water got you drunk, it would taste like this.

1.2
   AROMA 1/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 3/20
joesixpack (11) - Syracuse, New York, USA - JAN 28, 2002
A decent everyday beer. One of the better mass produced ones at any rate. Good alternative to Bud.

3
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 11/20
Puss Gutt99 (206) - Oldtown, Florida, USA - JAN 26, 2002
On a hot summer day and visualizing cold mountain spring water and sterile glass lined tanks... i can convince myself this is a good beer!

2
   AROMA 2/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 9/20
Burnt33399 (3) - Raeford, North Carolina, USA - JAN 23, 2002 does not count
A decent utility beer...Nothing spectacular about it, but it sure beats a Bud.

1
   AROMA 1/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 2/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 5/20
ravidesai (978) - Bombay, INDIA - JAN 22, 2002
UPDATED: APR 10, 2003 nothing distinctive about this beer. it is not unpleasant but neither is it enjoyable. standard light tasting bland lager. only good thing about it is that it is cheap and produced by a regional brewery( SW PA).

2.5
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 11/20
knugfjunk99 (5) - USA - JAN 16, 2002 does not count
Its OK for parties and cheap kegs, but it can get nastier than my friend HKDAWEI who drinks his own piss.

2.8
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 12/20
amx1970390 (480) - Southampton, Pennsylvania, USA - JAN 15, 2002
Very clean and smooth beer, quite refreshing, then again so is water. No real reason to buy this beer but for a mass pruduced domestic it sure beats Bud.

3
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 12/20
Gusler (2653) - Tucson, Arizona, USA - JAN 13, 2002
Re-rate 01/13/02: I have not sampled this beer for several years, and as my notes say, it is a clean and fresh tasting beer. Pours a nice clear gold color, large white head and generous lace. Malt nose, start is also malt and a bit sweet, the middle light, the finish dry, crisp and a bit of hop bite. Great beer? No, nice smooth drinking beer yes.


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page  1 « 172 173 174  175  176 177 178 » 189
Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5