overall
3
38
style
RATINGS: 1889   WEIGHTED AVG: 1.98/5   EST. CALORIES: 135   ABV: 4.5%
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
Ingredients: Water, malt, rice, hops, corn, brewers yeast.
From the glass lined tanks of Old Latrobe we tender this premium beer for your enjoyment, as a tribute to your good taste. It comes from the mountain springs to you.

Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5


2.5
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 11/20
knugfjunk99 (5) - USA - JAN 16, 2002 does not count
Its OK for parties and cheap kegs, but it can get nastier than my friend HKDAWEI who drinks his own piss.

2.8
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 12/20
amx1970390 (480) - Southampton, Pennsylvania, USA - JAN 15, 2002
Very clean and smooth beer, quite refreshing, then again so is water. No real reason to buy this beer but for a mass pruduced domestic it sure beats Bud.

3
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 12/20
Gusler (2653) - Tucson, Arizona, USA - JAN 13, 2002
Re-rate 01/13/02: I have not sampled this beer for several years, and as my notes say, it is a clean and fresh tasting beer. Pours a nice clear gold color, large white head and generous lace. Malt nose, start is also malt and a bit sweet, the middle light, the finish dry, crisp and a bit of hop bite. Great beer? No, nice smooth drinking beer yes.

3.2
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 15/20
WastedYouthBrew (143) - Phila (Home of Geno's Steaks), Pennsylvania, USA - JAN 7, 2002
A tasty beer. Very smooth and enjoyable. What’s with the “33”. I don’t like to be confused when I drink my beer.

2.1
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 9/20
TheRimmer (483) - Florida, USA - JAN 7, 2002
Eh. Light and goes down easy. Nothing to write home about. or someone elses home for that matter. I dont recall any foul feelings after the 6 pack, but I never got another. A little wimpy for me, but pleasing. No aftertaste either.

3.7
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 8/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 18/20
Beerlover1982 (78) - Lacrosse, Wisconsin, USA - JAN 4, 2002
Good but overpriced

2
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 6/20
NYDennis (64) - Port Jefferson Station, New York, USA - DEC 29, 2001
Frequently skunky as I find most beers in green bottles. Wouldnt go out of my way to drink this again.

1.3
   AROMA 2/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 2/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 5/20
Dragonblaze99 (353) - Greater London, ENGLAND - DEC 29, 2001
A notch above Bud, but way overpriced.

1.1
   AROMA 2/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 3/20
BillKismet (3991) - Seattle, Washington, USA - DEC 28, 2001
For some reason, many people consider this a quality a beer--as opposed to the other mass produced selections. More complex than many macro brews, but a disagreeable sour/bitter/skunky taste and displeasing aroma.

2.8
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 13/20
unixweb (237) - Sherman, Texas, USA - DEC 27, 2001
One of my favorite cheap beers. It has less sourness than most, is easy to drink, and the finish is clean and crisp. I choose it over most other American standards.


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page  1 « 173 174 175  176  177 178 179 » 189
Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5