changxao (104) - South Carolina, USA - JUL 12, 2003
They should call this "Rolling Rock Extra Light", since Rolling Rock already is light. About the same as the regular just lighter. bowen008 (134) - Houston, Texas, USA - JUN 30, 2003
I agree pointless. Just drink a Pepsi. I would be embarassed to have tried this if I hadn't heard about the Clear Beer tested in Austin. drewcifer85710 (158) - Youngstown, Ohio, USA - JUN 22, 2003
What the hell is going on here? Rolling Rock is ALREADY light. Don't you see it says 'Extra Pale' RIGHT THERE? This isn't bad so much as it's stupid and pointless. DragonStout (1418) - Groveport, Ohio, USA - JUN 19, 2003
what a wonderfull flavored water.What? this is not flavored water?Its beer. no way.It has all the charachteristics of water, Are u sure.Enough said. blank (996) - Austin, Texas, USA - MAY 10, 2003
suprising tolerable for a light beer. has the standard watery light beer taste, but one the better ones i've had.
Ludwig (60) - USA - APR 10, 2003
Bad.... Very, Very, Very, Very BAD & bitter.
I do not even consider this a beer.
MrJimmy (6) - Ontario, CANADA - APR 1, 2003 does not count
A real disappointment as this brew is certainly lacking. The taste is as thin as the body with a very short duration. jtribe21 (21) - Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA - MAR 8, 2003
Very watered down taste. Much better light beers out there. Stick with MGD light. pwyman (71) - Hubert, North Carolina, USA - FEB 23, 2003
Just a lighter version of the original Rolling Rock. I tried it just because it was there. Not much else you can say about this one. beerluvindave (194) - Canonsburg, Pennsylvania, USA - FEB 23, 2003
Similar to regular rolling rock, but lighter and a bit less skunked smell. Not much to say about this beer... find something better if you can.