vwsteggie (684) - Paxton, Massachusetts, USA - FEB 26, 2003
I had this on tap at the Piccadilly Pub in Sturbridge. Has a nice amber color with little carbonation and sweet malty smell. Taste is mildly malted and finishes with a refreshing bitterness. Overall this is a pretty good amber ale and is similar to the Uno amber, but better.VAYankee (353) - Virginia, USA - FEB 15, 2003
Earlier Rating: 10/28/2002 Total Score: 1.8
It is too Bass-ish for me. For some reason these seemingly popular beers just don't do anything for me. Well I guess thats why there is a variety...
Earlier Rating: 9/16/2002 Total Score: 2.6
Has a nice amber color with a good bit of carbonation. Taste is of hops with roasted malt and finishes moderately bitter. Overall this did not impress me.
A solid ale by Sam Adams. A smooth, slightly creamy ale with a light aftertaste. WabashMan (1024) - Noblesville, Indiana, USA - FEB 10, 2003
A decent ale, and better than some other sam adams products. A drinkable and available brew. estoppel (1028) - Buffalo, New York, USA - JAN 29, 2003
UPDATED: NOV 13, 2007 Funny thing - the day after Xmas I was in CT with the family and at lunch at a restaurant in West Hartford I sampled a local microbrew. Later, I looked for the beer to rate it but couldn’t find it (and didn’t recall the exact name, so I couldn’t add it). I forgot about that brew until tonight, when I had the Uno Amber, which looks, smells and tastes exactly like that alleged micro from CT. Anyway, this had an amber body, tight medium white head, and a bready and slightly hoppy nose. Well balanced bready malts and bitter hops in the flavor; nothing spectacular, but I had three with dinner.harlequinn (2744) - Tacoma, Washington, USA - JAN 20, 2003
Earlier Rating: 2/19/2002 Total Score: 3.1
The first micro that I ever sampled, about a decade ago. Returning to it now, I’m less impressed. I like the Boston Lager a lot more.
This is another wonderful creation from Sam Adams. An exteremely full body and light aftertaste. I still prefer the Lager though.
HighGravity (926) - Baltimore, Maryland, USA - JAN 19, 2003
(Best by 4/03) (Cincinnati Brewery) In typical Sam Adams fashion, the beer looks marvelous in the glass. The nose is slightly floral and spicy. The palate is cleaner than most S.A. beers. The brewer has done a good job at making this beer not scream pasteurization, which is a trademark of S.A., bottled beers. However, I do notice some off flavors that are restrained. My final analysis is a beer that is well balanced and easily quaffable, but is not very distinct. GiddyBoy (121) - USA - JAN 17, 2003
I definitely prefer the Ale to the SA Lager, which is more common here. Nice, dark color. Not cloudy at all. It had very little aftertaste, which wins points in my book. It has good body and is filling. It does not have a really "unique" ale taste, but is definitely a keeper. A good beer to have often and after meals. spicedad2 (78) - Huntingdon Valley, Pennsylvania, USA - JAN 16, 2003
A very heavy ale. Similar in flavor to the lager, with some estery flavors. It has a heavy body which is very filling. dberger624 (1028) - Voorhees, New Jersey, USA - JAN 15, 2003
Had this at the Pizzeria Uno at Franklin Mills Mall in Phila. Nothing wrong with it. Nothing special. Easy drinking beer that's a change from the main 3 that are offered. Turtboy (120) - Lucasville, Ohio, USA - JAN 11, 2003
Good ale, little low on the ABV but an easy drink...........................