MilkmanDan (1943) - Eagan, Minnesota, USA - DEC 4, 2004
Dark red-brown with a nice looking mocha head, good creaminess to it. Nose is a combination of chocolate and an odd tanginess. Taste and palate initially are that of chocolate milk in that "this is too sweet to be real chocolate" sort of way. Not offensive, but generally tastes artificial and cheap. argo0 (14127) - Washington DC, USA - DEC 4, 2004
Clear garnet body with creamy beige head. Aroma is moderately sweet, chocolate, caramel. Taste is moderately sweet, chocolate, caramel. Creamy medium body. A beer for non-beer drinkers -- sweet and no bitterness.. joshpiledean (316) - Seattle, Washington, USA - DEC 3, 2004
It’s been said, but I’ll say it again...a little high priced for a bottle of beer. Poured like a cola, but with a longer lasting head and smaller bubblies. Aroma is chocolate and roasted malt. Comes off as thin, first taste is bitter chocolate, with a long long aftertaste. Not good, but not bad either. Either way, not worth the money spent. I’ll definately pimp the bottle, though. meathookjones (245) - Sterling, Virginia, USA - DEC 3, 2004
A bit pricey at 15 bucks a bottle but I decided to pick it up anyway. This pours out a brown color with reddish highlights and a good looking tan head that quickly drops to a ring of bubbles. All I could detect in the aroma is chocolate and maybe a touch of roasted coffee. Chocolate is dominant in the flavor with hints of roasted malts and coffee stirring about but not much else. I love chocolate and beer but the taste just wasn’t doing it for me. Mouthfeel was a bit thin and well carbonated. Drinkability was fairly low as I was getting sick of the taste and had trouble finishing the bottle. Not something I would try again for that price but not a bad beer. krisbierjaeger (844) - dolores, Colorado, USA - DEC 2, 2004
this is the first label i’ve seen that might require a crowbar and welder’s torch to remove for my collection. very chic. indeed, when a beer is this expensive, hyped and luxuriously bottled, i can’t help but prepare--unconsciously even-- to wax poetic and silly about it’s pressumed greatness before i’ve even tasted it. pouring it into a snifter, i was already composing in my mind some extravagant praises, like this: "rivulets of chestnut brown gurgling like an appalachian cascade, pooling into the glass, and sending up a heady celebration of big-bubbled foam"-- and crap like that. and admittedly, it’s true that the appearance of the pour IS quite nice. but fancy talk is wasted on this lame-o beer-- this isn’t godiva, this is ovaltine. one sniff and i felt as ripped off as a waiter gettin’ a two buck tip on a ninety dollar tab. i positioned my nose over the brew expecting a rich updraft of sweet aromas-- like you’d expect when opening a fat belgian dubbel-- and got: nothing! i sniffed this beer --and then sniffed a newspaper-- and found the newspaper to be more deliciously fragrant. this bock’s aroma is thin, and resembles only a rolo melting on an english muffin in a microwave in the upstairs apartment where the guy collects moldy clothes for the salvation army. i was swirling it so hard to coax up some more aroma that i reckon i’d spilled five bucks worth. as it warmed, i got some nutty orange effects as well, but truly-- it holds it’s aroma too close to appreciate-- like a gambler hiding his poker hand. tasting did little to ameliorate the disappointed feeling that was growing: yoo hoo chocolate sweetness on a thin malt-o-meal flavored body. the carbonation is creamy, but thin, and these sweet cola malts with no apparent alcohol or bitterness come up short in my estimation, as woefully short as a pygmy in the NBA. i had trouble finishing it, and it was inappropriately sweet-- like a nasty cat it reached out and cloyed me for no reason-- it cloyed me to the core of my being. i reread the instructions thinking that i used it incorrectly. maybe i opened the wrong end of the bottle. maybe i’m supposed to be fourteen years old and easily impressed by a candy-flavored dunkle. maybe probably i’ll give it a big MISS next time around.
YogiBeera (2569) - New Jersey, USA - DEC 1, 2004
Yeah - this bottle rocks- really cool lable. Wonderful chocolate and vanilla nose - sweet but not too sweet. Dark colored, no head. Wonderful Milk chocolate taste with slightly bitter intervalls what is actually great as this avoids to let it taste too sweet. A great accomplishment to a berry-dessert. jmuhops (669) - Winchester, Virginia, USA - NOV 29, 2004
Beautiful bottle. Pours very dark with hardly any head. Chocolate and vanilla aroma. Sweet flavor, but the chocolate provides enough subtle bitterness to keep it from being cloying. Still tasted like beer, which was a pleasant surprise. Decent stuff if you can find it at a halfway reasonable price. Sickboy282 (1114) - San Diego, California, USA - NOV 28, 2004
Pours a deep brown hue with a small head. Aromas of vanilla. Flavors of chocolate, vanilla and chocolate. Foamy finish. footbalm (1219) - Western Minneapolis Suburbs, Minnesota, USA - NOV 28, 2004
Dark brown brew with a nice creamy head.Nose is very sweet and nice.the chocolate isn’t just chocolate it is a blend of malts and the sweet of the choc.But is is just to sweet on the tongue for me. Cornfield (5570) - Oak Forest, Illinois, USA - NOV 27, 2004
The brew poured a dark coffee color and seemed to have a reddish tint. The head was meager and soon departed. The aroma was good, a sweet maltiness with cocoa on top of it. But the taste seemed too sweet. This much chocolate in an already naturally sweet beer style was a bit too much, but not cloyingly so. I’d rather spend my bucks on a chocolate stout, something that will counter the sweetness somewhat.