RATINGS: 353   WEIGHTED AVG: 1.44/5   EST. CALORIES: 177   ABV: 5.9%
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
Since 2001, contract-brewed for Pabst Brewing (San Antonio), as Pabst no longer owns a brewery of its own.

A tick is a star rating
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5


1.2
Ernest (7890) - Boulder, Colorado, USA - AUG 1, 2002
Head is initially small, fizzy, white, fully diminishing. Body is clear light yellow. Aroma is trace malt (cereal), trace hops (herbs), with light notes of DMS and alcohol. Flavor is moderately sweet, lightly bitter. Finish is lightly sweet, lightly bitter. Medium body, watery (almost creamy) texture, fizzy carbonation. Almost no aroma and sweet, but pretty respectable body and texture.

0.5
legion242 (2348) - Richardson, Texas, USA - AUG 1, 2002
UPDATED: JUN 4, 2007 I have begun my decsent into hell- I am going to try as many Malt Liquors that I can get my hands on. medium yellow color; big head dissipated quickly; astrigent nose. Sickenly sweet. Actually has a nice mouth feel.

0.5
jpknight22 (171) - Charlotte, North Carolina, USA - JUL 28, 2002
OK, nothing called 'malt liquor' deserves an elaborate description of the palate, and aftertaste. In fact, one word describes it all - Rancid. This beverage has been of use to me for one purpose - a college theme party entitled 'Forties and the Frog' where guys drink 40's of Schlitz and St. Ides out of brown paper bags (ghetto style)and girls drink the local favorite community punch (in our case bullfrog). Nuf said...

1.3
Aurelius (5659) - Tallahassee, Florida, USA - JUL 15, 2002
There's actually some malt in the nose... not terrible, but there are definitely more drinkable quarts of stuff out there.

1.1
LordNeuf (136) - Acton, Massachusetts, USA - JUL 9, 2002
UPDATED: JAN 16, 2004 This bottle comes with a message in it and the message is 'BEWARE, This is not a beer for drinking, it is for laying down and avoiding.' Only use for Hand to Hand Combat

0.6
kansassooner (4) - Moore, Oklahoma, USA - JUN 24, 2002 does not count
Ick....that's all I have to say.............................................

0.5
bigal9699 (152) - Orange County, California, USA - JUN 3, 2002
Another in the 'cheap beer - quick buzz' category. Plain awful - high in alcy and carbonation. Yuck!

1.2
Bolt (117) - Boulder Creek, California, USA - MAY 29, 2002
Great commercials... really BAD beer!! YUK.................................

0.5
foduck (330) - Seattle, Washington, USA - MAY 25, 2002
UPDATED: JUN 29, 2004 $1.49 for a 40oz. Some kind of chemical taste I can't identify. Scary stuff really. Nice label though. Not all that strong for a malt liquor. Horrible stuff but cheap. RE-rate: The alcohol is right up front in this. Unpleasant flavor all around, but the finish is rather clean and dry so that helps.

1.6
austinpowers (2831) - San Francisco, California, USA - MAY 15, 2002
You could do worse. It beats the Camo and OE800............................


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page  1 « 30 31 32  33  34 35 36 » 38
A tick is a star rating
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5