RATINGS: 578   WEIGHTED AVG: 1.79/5   EST. CALORIES: 138   ABV: 4.6%
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
Since 2001, contract-brewed for Pabst Brewing (San Antonio), as Pabst no longer owns a brewery of its own. The old time Schlitz purchased from Strohs which was purchased from Joseph Schlitz. Different than Schlitz Malt Liquor.

There is also a listing for "Schlitz Classic 1960s Formula". Please note version, and rate in the appropriate entry.

Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5


1.5
   AROMA 2/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 7/20
tourette (225) - Seattle, Washington, USA - MAR 4, 2002
Pretty poor american standard. There are worse, but not by much.

0.5
   AROMA 1/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 1/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 1/20
daninorlando99 (49) - Orlando, Florida, USA - FEB 21, 2002
would rather drink microwaved piss

0.5
   AROMA 1/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 1/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 1/20
quiksilverxtc99 (99) - USA - FEB 20, 2002
you aint got schlitz? i hope noone does, it would be a crime.

0.6
   AROMA 1/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 1/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 2/20
Davhgbrew (948) - Seattle, Washington, USA - FEB 14, 2002
There are few cheap Americans I just cant drink, even to get drunk. Old Milwaukee, Pabst Blue Ribbon, OE, and this stuff.

1.9
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 9/20
kmeves (1098) - Mount Pleasant, Wisconsin, USA - FEB 11, 2002
UPDATED: SEP 3, 2008 Pours a very clear yellow with a small white head. Aroma of corn and metal. Flavor is corn and light hops. Very light bodied, thin texture. Short tinny finish. I can see why they brought back the original formula.

2
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 8/20
Ringo (963) - Loveland, Colorado, USA - FEB 9, 2002
Schlitz was a lot better when it was made by Schlitz and came in those big steel 24 oz. cans that had the seam going up the side. I loved those! But I enjoy the soapy quality of the beer, thats why they call it suds. True Homer Simpson beer.

3.3
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 8/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 14/20
snowman32199 (21) - USA - FEB 9, 2002
At one time this was the no.1 selling beer in America.

1.3
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 2/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 5/20
Ron (3742) - Rochester, New York, USA - FEB 5, 2002
This was not a good beer. I think Genesee is a much better beer than this.

1.4
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 4/20
Radek Kliber (7239) - Toronto (Can) Krotoszyn (Pol), POLAND - JAN 20, 2002
Bad , bad beer . Soapy , dirty , low quality brew . Smalls bad , just like lower class m.liqs . Expect side effects next day....

3.6
   AROMA 7/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 15/20
bighair (51) - Hamilton, Ohio, USA - JAN 18, 2002
UPDATED: SEP 8, 2003 don't believe the hype--it's not that bad. a nice and cheap beer. beats the hell out of bud light.


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page  1 « 52 53 54  55  56 57 58
Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5