overall
8
18
style
RATINGS: 632   WEIGHTED AVG: 2.33/5   IBU: 13   EST. CALORIES: 132   ABV: 4.4%
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
A true golden lager with a golden heritage of natural brewing.

Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5


2.4
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 11/20
Yankovitch333 (612) - Baltimore, Maryland, USA - SEP 20, 2005
Did someone say Rolling Rock? I mean Shiner Blonde. Is there a differnce? I think its the label. I like the label. The beer kind of sucks. Nice citrus flavors. Thats about it. Refreshing on a really hot day.

1.6
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 5/20
JMerritt (1941) - Macomb, Illinois, USA - SEP 15, 2005
Light yellow in color with a small, diminishing white head. Straw, wet wheat, and honey aroma. Grassy, grainy flavor is slightly metallic and has some flavor that reminds me of glue. Carbonation is high and distracting. About as good as Bud/Miller/Coors.

2
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 7/20
dirtymike (2016) - Manchester, New Hampshire, USA - SEP 9, 2005
Deep straw in color with a small white head.Aroma and flavor of mild hops and grainy malt.

2.1
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 7/20
BeerRules (243) - Houston, Texas, USA - SEP 7, 2005
Had a vegetal aroma with some spicyness. Dry, crisp, and bitter taste. Not great by any means.

2.1
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 9/20
Kevin (2194) - Texas, USA - AUG 12, 2005
light yellow color with a white head. aroma is corn and and sour bitter. taste is light and easy drinking grassy bitter and a minimal sweetness in the finish. a bit too much adjunct taste. there is some lemon in this too. a bit better than most macro pilsners.

2.9
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 13/20
fly (1475) - austin, Tejas, Texas, USA - AUG 8, 2005
A rose by any other name is still a rose and a fair beer, whether called "Premium" or the newer, cooler, more attractive "Blond" is still that same beer. Known by some of us as Bock w/o caramel coloring, this is actually the better of the two, though thats not saying a lot.

2.4
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 9/20
shrubber85 (11088) - Greenville, Indiana, USA - AUG 4, 2005
Bottle. Sweet wheat malt aroma. Golden yellow color wiht small head and slight efferverscence. Sweet corn flake malt flavor. Smooth but the corn flake flavor isnt something I like much.

2.5
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 12/20
JK (6020) - St. Louis Park, Minnesota, USA - JUL 7, 2005
This is an ok beer with very good palate. It is smooth and easy to drink, but unremarkable in any other way. Yellow, no head. Light hop flavor. Better as it warms.

2.4
   AROMA 1/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 9/20
OutHouseDilemma (70) - Crowley, Texas, USA - JUN 10, 2005
Bottle. Something is missing from this beer. This is probably my least favorite shiner brew. The smell is slight wheat/hops with a strong metallic finish. The taste is very bland with slight hops and a small hint of caramel and sweet malts. It was ok after mowing the lawn. I gave a lil bit to the grass..

1.3
   AROMA 2/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 4/20
BeerAteHer (384) - St. Paul, Minnesota, USA - MAY 23, 2005
This is hardly a "blonde" except for a touch of wheat in the finish. Cheap macro flavor and appearance. Texas has a strong Mexican influence of course, and similarly perhaps, Texas is known for great mixed drinks but lousy beer.


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page  1 « 50 51 52  53  54 55 56 » 64
Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5