overall
13
36
style
RATINGS: 1851   WEIGHTED AVG: 2.58/5   EST. CALORIES: 132   ABV: 4.41%
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
Is a distinctive, rich, full-flavored, deep amber-colored beer with an inviting smooth taste without excessive bitterness.

Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5


3
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 13/20
Frank (4147) - Chicago, Illinois, USA - DEC 10, 2004
UPDATED: NOV 26, 2005 Well, thanks to my secret santa I can finally take this off my beer list... I dont know why, I just have a thing for cheap regionals and this one always had a certain mystique to it. First things first, this isnt a bock or anything close. Too low in alcohol and without that heavy munich malt sweetness. Its very brown in color but not really dark with just a small ring of foam on top. Nose is mild with a bit of toasty malt character. Light in flavor but theres still enough malt depth to keep me somewhat interested. Light bodied with slightly fizzy carbonation but very easy drinking. A slight tart tang in the finish rounds things out. I can see why this would be popular regionally. Its head and shoulders above BMC swill.

2.5
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 9/20
Nexxus (261) - Apple Valley, Minnesota, USA - DEC 8, 2004
Clear medium brownish amber with a medium frothy off white head. Aroma of toast, caramel, herbs, and apricot with a hint of lemon. Medium watery body with lively carbonation. Flavor of toast, caramel, herbs and a hint of spice with a lemon twang in the finish. Very drinkable but nothing special. Not bad.

2.4
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 8/20
badgerben (5043) - Blaine, Minnesota, USA - DEC 4, 2004
Pours a brown color with thin head. Weak malt aroma. The malt tastes very sweet n sour... not at all what Id want from a bock. Its better than pure swill, but only by a little.

2
   AROMA 2/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 9/20
beerandrugby (210) - Nashville, Tennessee, USA - DEC 3, 2004
Ok beer, nice color, nice that it is not made by a juggernaught brewery poised on world domination like miller, or busch. I just dont like this beer as much as my friends do. The taste is too much like a weird version of newcastle brown, with a mettalic overtone. But like I said, Ill buy it over something from the big brewers.

2.7
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 12/20
mstockton (225) - Frankfurt, GERMANY - NOV 30, 2004
Not too bad. When in Texas, no reason not to support this stuff vs. the mainstream beers. Kind of an amber like beer witha little bit of flavor. Not great, but drinkable.

2.4
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 10/20
zack (2) - USA - NOV 27, 2004 does not count
Drinkable. Basic beer flavor. Cola-like head. Dark amber-colored beer that tastes like light beer on steroids, with a bit more acidity and aftertaste. Nothing special here. Good beer for the price though.

1.9
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 7/20
BuckNaked (1230) - Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA - NOV 23, 2004
Bottle: Ruby amber color with a tiny off-white head that quickly fades. Aroma: oxidation, grains, light caramel, metal, corn, cardboard. Taste: Grain, corn, metal, oxidized, some caramel hidden in there. Very watery and light. I tell myself I only tried this beer because I had to buy a 6 pack of it for trade.

2
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 7/20
joshpiledean (316) - Seattle, Washington, USA - NOV 22, 2004
Nice pour, nice color, decent head. Aroma is grainy/malty, minimal hops present. Thin on the palate, flavor is metallic grains. Bland is the name of the game here. Short aftertaste. I think this could be a decent "gateway" for introducing someone to more flavorful and exotic brews.

1
   AROMA 2/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 1/20
erway (1004) - Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA - NOV 15, 2004
Pours lite amber with a fizzy head. Aroma is of oxidation, diacetyl, and faint caramel. Mouthfeel is thin and watery. Taste is bland with some really bad oxidation. Despite all this, what really makes this beer bad is the arrogance of the brewery. Calling this a bock is like calling Gennesee cream ale a barleywine. The two have nothing to fucking do with eachother. A bock is rich and spicy. A bock has over 6% abv and this falls short. A bock is supposed to be liquid bread; this is liquid shit. Shame on the brewery and shame on me for trying it.

2.7
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 11/20
robertsreality (2460) - Minnesota, USA - NOV 11, 2004
Light Muddy Brown Coloring With Good Head. Little Malt and Grain There, but Overall, Pretty Bland....


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page  1 « 146 147 148  149  150 151 152 » 186
Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5