overall
n/a
0
style

bottling
unknown

on tap
unknown

distribution
unknown

Add Distribution Data
RATINGS: 151   WEIGHTED AVG: 1.11/5   EST. CALORIES: 120   ABV: 4%
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
Brewed with the highest quality all-natural ingredients, it is a remarkably clean, refreshing premium beer with 2.5 grams of carbohydrates pre bottle.

Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5


1.5
thepegjett (1260) - Cambridge (via Winnipeg), Cambridgeshire, ENGLAND - JUN 14, 2011
A - Not much there A - Light.... T - Watery...but the clear bottle gives it a bit of skunk P - Watery O - Beer needs carbs

2.6
punkska101 (2030) - Chambly, Quebec, CANADA - MAY 8, 2011
Clear light golden. A: light cereal, a bit of herbal hops not much. F: light watery body finish is sweet and short. O: thirst quenching beer its in style.

1.6
GarnotingPete (777) - Montréal, Quebec, CANADA - MAY 1, 2011
Une bière limpide, de couleur or, sans col particulier. Des arômes chétifs de céréales et un houblonage quasi absent. Plutôt insipide. Bière mince, à l’effervescence moyenne et à la fin abrupte.

1.5
DeanF (2456) - Alberta, CANADA - DEC 14, 2010
Being a masochist of sorts I’m always fascinated by the "light" beer craze of North America. I never found a "light" beer in Europe, as people were happy to know that their beer tasted like beer. Except in the case of Kriek, but then it tasted like Kriek, and not water. Speaking of which, why haven’t the big commercial brewers tried to market a Kriek-style brew to the same people who might buy a "light" beer? Nonetheless, in my further education of all things related to beer being "light", whatever that may mean at any given time, this stuff pours with a very pale and clear body but still a small layer of head. Faint aroma of murky hops, which was more than I was expecting. Taste is a smooth nothingness with just a vague hint of malt if you tilt your head correctly at the right time. Dry finish, at least. I’m still looking for that "light" beer that’s worth drinking instead of a fine soda water.

1.1
RayOhm (474) - Fergus, Ontario, CANADA - DEC 1, 2010
this is essentially water with a hint of beer. not offensive but not worth the price sleeman sells these for now.

0.5
hbball (1) - USA - OCT 27, 2010 does not count
This beer is so bad, when I saw a piece on Minyanville today commenting on it being on this list, I head to sign up for this account to add my own rating in agreement. It is low in calories, though, which will help you lose weight by (a) forcing yourself to try a bottle; (b) not drinking any more beer that night if this is all you bought.

0.5
jimpapa (1) - USA - OCT 21, 2010 does not count
the condensation on the outside of the bottle tastes better than the stuff on the inside

1
sseb69 (1909) - Gatineau, Quebec, CANADA - SEP 10, 2010
Bouteille 341 ml. 4%. Couleur jaune pâle. Arôme quasi inexistant. Ok ne perdons pas de temps ici. À moins d’avoir un problème de santé et de devoir boire une "low carb", on boit autre chose.

1.9
Maddy (2) - USA - SEP 8, 2010 does not count
Listen guys and gals. This is not such a terrible beer. It won’t put hair on your chest, but it is a Sleeman’s after all. Let’s get real here. A light taste to quench your thirst without the strong after taste. So here’s to you all as I take sip of my Sleeman’s Clear.

0.6
Zenwolf (269) - Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA - AUG 30, 2010
Bottle. Just enough taste to let you know you should not have ordered it. Even dead cold there isn’t anything to redeem this. So many better beer’s in Canada...


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page  1 2 3  4  5 6 7 » 16
Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5