sleepdirt (169) - Winnipeg, Manitoba, CANADA - DEC 31, 2004
1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
The perfect beer for people who don’t like the taste of beer. I had it without the lime....suppose the lime gives it that fruity summertime flavour. Otherwise this is a truly awful beer.
Diablokev (179) - Lakewood, Colorado, USA - DEC 26, 2004
1.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Is this Corona?? I think they just slap another label on this stuff and call it Sol (Sun). The aroma was faint, the appearance was a plae gold with little head. The flavor was well... I think thats enough for this one.
SilkTork (5602) - Southampton, United Kingdom, Hampshire, ENGLAND - DEC 26, 2004
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
Bottle. Clean, grassy slightly sweet lager. Very light and inoffensive, though, as with all these cheap lagers, the tastes becomes shitty as it warms.
jgentgesdo (693) - Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA - NOV 28, 2004
1.5 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 6/20
Bottle. Pale yellow, thin head. Smells like nothing. Tastes like corn adjunct with some fizz. Watery, no aftertaste. In other words, a perfect pale lager.
Dorqui (2213) - Brescia, ITALY - NOV 23, 2004
1.4 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 7/20
UPDATED: APR 25, 2005 Evanescent foam. It polishes but extinguished. Notes of lemon render it a lot fizzy. Then nothing. Without body of aroma.
StewardofGondor (1934) - Washington Heights - Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA - NOV 15, 2004
0.9 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
UPDATED: NOV 16, 2004 You could do better than this. When I was in Puerto Vallarta, this was the beer that had the largest presence. My guess is that it was prominantly featured because it’s cheap. The taste is very similar to a crappy Bud Light, but with more fizz. Think laundry or dish soap detergent. If you make it commonplace to consume those, than this is your beer. Otherwise, I think the overall rating in the 3rd precentile is just about right for this sub-par Mexican brew.
beaconstreet (811) - Washington DC, USA - OCT 28, 2004
2.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 12/20
Thousands of bubbles that flow and flow, and they don’t stop, no! Golden blonde color. Very nice. Clear bottle, looks cheap, but no screw cap? Interesting. I actually liked this beer, and can see it complimenting fish, Mexican (of course), and even pork really well. A good table beer. Do we call beers like this that?
Nekronos (4178) - Xalapa, MEXICO - OCT 16, 2004
3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
UPDATED: JAN 30, 2006 Its flavor depends on the bottle type, if you find it in a standard bottle it tastes ok, but if you get it in a non-get back bottle it’s a nightmare, even worse than Corona.
maeib (8749) - Wootton, Northampton, Northamptonshire, ENGLAND - OCT 16, 2004
1.1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20
UPDATED: JUL 28, 2013 Bottled. Almost clear sweet and awful beer. Very little of anything except sweet alcohol. There’s nothing nasty, but that’s because there’s not much of anything. Poor poor poor! Score 0.7
Subsequent rating scored 1.6. Average becomes 1.1
Cornfield (5570) - Oak Forest, Illinois, USA - SEP 15, 2004
1.4 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
UPDATED: NOV 27, 2005 An acceptable warm weather pale lager. Nothing exceptional in aroma or taste. Lime it up.
<font size=-4><a href=http://www.ratebeer.com/Places/ShowPlace.asp? Liquors, Bridgeview, IL<font size=-1>