awebster (165) - Knoxville, Tennessee, USA - MAR 30, 2006
Just like American macrobrews. I.E. not very good. Pale, watery, bland. ’Nuff said. biggcb (464) - Harleysville, Pennsylvania, USA - MAR 29, 2006
If nothing else, this is very ordinary. It is not a bad beer, but does not do justice to most of the other products that come out of Belgium. Calling it the Budweiser of Belgium might be a little tough, but not too far from the truth. CardsFanBudMan (3) - St. Louis, Missouri, USA - MAR 29, 2006 does not count
One of my all time favorites! Like beer in general, it is an acquired taste. eboats (1082) - Omaha, Nebraska, USA - MAR 29, 2006
I actually have notes on this. Let me sum them up:
Pile of shit kgwthxbye. onystrom (1333) - Magellan Hunter! - Skanderborg, DENMARK - MAR 28, 2006
Clear yellow color with a great head. Ordinary lager but not a bad one, No spiciness in mine...
AmazonMatt (285) - PANAMA - MAR 25, 2006
You’ve got to be kidding me! "Beautiful", "citrus", "hoppy"???? Well, mine WAS from a can, but I’ve had from a bottle earlier, and I didn’t finish that either, so I don’t think that I am biased by the can....
There is little about this beer that makes it noticable over a Tecate or a Corona. And I am not being biased by style, there is much more complexity in a Beck’s, which I recently had, or a Sam Adams.
Pours pee yellow with an eggshell head, no corn or rice flavors. I think that there is only barley in this one (so it gets over a 2). No spice on the finish, in fact rather flat on the taste meter. There are much better options, even in Panama. I don’t understand why, when I visited NYC last summer that this beer was so freaking trendy....Rolling Rock is better. This beer doesn’t deserve being Belgian. sanmiguel (118) - Illinois, USA - MAR 25, 2006
Bottled. Beautiful. Citrus aroma, fruity flavor, smooth finish. Recommended! Tejas (1006) - Dallas, Texas, USA - MAR 23, 2006
Preface: This was tasted after a few scotches and Miller Lites at the hockey game. I don’t think this one is as bad as a 21 rating. It wasn’t great but it did have some body and a little spiciness. Also, was plenty drinkable. I could put quite a few away in one sitting. StueyD (1583) - Heacham, Norfolk, ENGLAND - MAR 21, 2006
A light, pale yellow colour with a weak, white head. The nose is an immediate tinny, citrusy aroma, with some hoppy notes after. The taste is also of dry hoppiness, but rather tasteless in the finish. dj (620) - Greater London, ENGLAND - MAR 18, 2006
UPDATED: MAY 30, 2006 Bottle, 330ml. A pale yellow-coloured pour with a large fizzy mostly-diminishing head. Faint aroma of hops. Not much in the taste department, but a reasonable bitter finish for this type of lager. High carbonation. Drinkable, but not great.