turbo (1271) - Arizona, USA - MAR 27, 2005
Green bottle poured yellow with a good white head and heavy lacing.
Aroma was malty,spice and a bit skunky.
Flavor was malt, corn with a heavy metalic finish.
Great lacing, but not that good of a beer. JFURYCAT (1078) - East Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania, USA - MAR 26, 2005
This beer does not offer a lot of flavor but personally I find it relaxing. It has a little of the skunkiness you find in Heineken but it isn’t as overt. It is definately one of the better mainstream commercial lagers on the market as it is a highly drinkable beer. However, it seems to lack a distinct taste that sets it apart from its competitors. In a few words: kind of bland but not offensive. 11026 (1772) - Alabama, USA - MAR 25, 2005
Can. Golden color with a decent white head. Good lacing. Aroma is a touch stale and lightly malty. Lighter bodied, well carbonated. Initial sweet tastes are quickly balanced by hops. Somewhat crisp. Decent Lunkie (1956) - Glen Iris, AUSTRALIA - MAR 25, 2005
Sweet hop aroma. Clear yellow colour with poor head. Sweet malt flavour. Fizzy palate. Good summer BBQ beer when flavour is not important. kyuss (21) - BELGIUM - MAR 24, 2005
One of the best lagers I’ve had. Not too bitter, fresh flavor, can’t expect more from a standard lager. Great beer for a night out/on the couch, but not for tasting.
TomSpears (65) - Norfolk, ENGLAND - MAR 24, 2005
People call this wife-beater or some such unpleasant name. The common drink of tramps and low-lifes. Yet it has a classy advert on the TV. And the tag-line "Reasurringly Expensive". It’s a decent enough drink. Much cheaper in France where it seems to be regarded as the common and everyday beer that it is. mikeben (355) - Naperville, Illinois, USA - MAR 22, 2005
Thought this was Italian as I had it at an Italian dinner. Pretty good though it was slightly skunky in smell. It looked champainge like and tasted that way too. Very light but pleasent with a nice bubly body. Not earth shaking but good, NoiZe (2322) - Zeist, NETHERLANDS - MAR 19, 2005
Just another pilsener like all the rest.. It tastes not incredible good, not bad either. A bit on the watery side.
jde123 (775) - Washington, Washington DC, USA - MAR 19, 2005
UPDATED: MAY 21, 2006 A fairly decent lager, better than most offered at local bars. Nice, crisp and fruity tasting. Definately worth the money. can8ianben (1577) - State College, Pennsylvania, USA - MAR 17, 2005
Classy looking bottle and label are a little misleading. Although this beer is not overly bad, it doesn’t impress. Enjoy it if you are offered one for free, but there are better ways to spend your $$$.