joet (2606) - Wilsonville, Oregon, USA - JUL 18, 2001
Almost Mexican tasting in it’s malt and near-spicy bitter. Prone to skunk. Not entirely bad for a macro. Nagash (207) - Paris, FRANCE - JUL 11, 2002
Watery, no taste. I was not able to really to appreciate it. Need to re-rate. Erol99 (24) - Ontario, CANADA - AUG 5, 2002
Primium? I couldn’t taste anything. Sure it looks nice goes down easy, but a little too easy. Very timid.... Its a weak drink. MaxPower (961) - St. Louis, Missouri, USA - SEP 3, 2002
good color and a nice head, light hop aroma, not all that good. mrkimchee (1414) - Toronto, Ontario, CANADA - SEP 6, 2002
I’m sure the original stella(if there was one) tasted exactly like this. they must have had boring lagers in the 1300’s.
mutant (854) - Melbourne, AUSTRALIA - FEB 16, 2003
Thick, bitter then sour and full of chemicals. Whoops, not 75 characters. There - that's better. PushEject (42) - Palmdale, California, USA - APR 16, 2003
A fancy Budweiser with a harsher bite and higher alchohol content. Typical lager clean & dry finish. A good beer if you like mass-produced American lagers, but not stellar. duff (5484) - Copenhagen, DENMARK - OCT 27, 2002
This time i’m having one brewed by New Zealand breweries in Auckland, NZ, i think this is a bit blander than the Belgian version, sweet, with a slight bitter edge on the finish, better than most macro lagers, similiar to the Belgian brewed Stella, not too much difference.