joet (2656) - Wilsonville, Oregon, USA - JUL 18, 2001
Almost Mexican tasting in it's malt and near-spicy bitter. Prone to skunk. Not entirely bad for a macro. Nagash (207) - Paris, FRANCE - JUL 11, 2002
Watery, no taste. I was not able to really to appreciate it. Need to re-rate. Erol99 (24) - Ontario, CANADA - AUG 5, 2002
Primium? I couldn't taste anything. Sure it looks nice goes down easy, but a little too easy. Very timid.... Its a weak drink. MaxPower (961) - St. Louis, Missouri, USA - SEP 3, 2002
good color and a nice head, light hop aroma, not all that good.............. mrkimchee (1414) - Toronto, Ontario, CANADA - SEP 6, 2002
I'm sure the original stella(if there was one) tasted exactly like this. they must have had boring lagers in the 1300's.
mutant (854) - Melbourne, AUSTRALIA - FEB 16, 2003
Thick, bitter then sour and full of chemicals. Whoops, not 75 characters. There - that's better. haukur (2079) - Kópavogur, ICELAND - APR 4, 2003
UPDATED: APR 23, 2005 belgian version, very skunky, watery, some corns, not very good ............ PushEject (42) - Palmdale, California, USA - APR 16, 2003
A fancy Budweiser with a harsher bite and higher alchohol content. Typical lager clean & dry finish. A good beer if you like mass-produced American lagers, but not stellar. RichardWilding (201) - London, Greater London, ENGLAND - JUN 15, 2003
This is a very dissapointing beer, so much for the reassuringly expensive advertising. It is over-rated and not something I will be rushing out to buy again. BrewEd (182) - Wilmington, North Carolina, USA - JUN 24, 2003
Pale yellow with very little head. Not much aroma to speak of; this can be said of the taste as well. A light pilsner, I can't say its objectionable, however it certainly isn't remarkable in any way.