Stone 10.10.10 Vertical Epic Ale

 
overall
88
84
style

bottling
unknown

on tap
unknown

distribution
unknown

Add Distribution Data
RATINGS: 629   WEIGHTED AVG: 3.51/5   EST. CALORIES: 285   ABV: 9.5%
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
This ninth edition of our Stone Vertical Epic Ale series takes two interesting left turns. A Belgian-style golden triple is the starting point of this beer, but the first left turn is nearly immediate with the addition of dried chamomile flowers, triticale, and Belgian amber candi sugar. The second, and rather unusual left turn takes us half an hour up the road from Stone to Temecula courtesy of the addition of just-pressed Muscat, Gewurztraminer and Sauvignon Blanc grapes from our friends at South Coast Winery. As the Stone Vertical Epic Ale series has moved through the calendar, we found that the brewing schedule for a 10.10.10 release coincided nicely with the grape harvest, neatly providing an interesting twist in this epic ale.

Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5


3.2
jjh19 (63) - California, USA - NOV 1, 2010
Tiny bubbles, bright yellow color. A little spicy smell. Quite sour, some herbal notes. Fairly light mouthfeel, a little dry. It’s a fine saison, nothing to win me completely over to the style, but worth trying.

3.6
fidel (1302) - Livermore, California, USA - NOV 1, 2010
Poured golden orange, white grapes, bready, floral, little honey, little yeasty.

3.7
padrefan98 (854) - (San Diego) Santee, California, USA - NOV 1, 2010
Poured from a 22oz bottle into a Chimay glass. Lots of fruit aroma, grapes, wine, funky smell. Tasty with some vinious qualities. Not sour but some wine and grape with peppery aftertaste. Pretty good. I would like to see what this one taste like in a couple of years.

3.4
temporrari (398) - Fort Wayne, Indiana, USA - OCT 31, 2010
Slightly odd beer. Just a tad funky. Kinda spicy, kinda dry, lively on the tongue. It’s alright. I do detect the grapes, something I don’t care for. So yeah. I only had a few good gulps, but honestly that’s all I really needed. Not as shitty as the last couple have been, but the 06 is still tops for me. Here’s hoping for the final two in the series to rock it.

3.5
Kinz (3786) - Glen Allen, Virginia, USA - OCT 31, 2010
UPDATED: NOV 1, 2014 Medium gold, light haze, OK head. Aroma of sweet malts, belgian spice. Flavor is pils malts, sweet, touch of cotton candy,perfumed flowers, and a faint lightly sour fruit finish. Flavor is a match. Sort of a triple with some spicing. Honestly, this one didn’t move me much. RERATE: Smokey honey aroma. Flavor matches a bit too. Not bad.

3.7
dirt55 (198) - Washington, USA - OCT 31, 2010
Pours clear golden with thin white head, aroma of candi sugar with floral honey like aromas and slight hint of biscuit, complex flavors of slight sweet malt, grassy hops, and a hint of sour fruit. Medium palate med/light carb. Couldn’t wait the recommended 2 years aging :-)

4
kidrobot (103) - Port Charlotte, New Jersey, USA - OCT 30, 2010
There are so many tastes in this I cant pick one out. Incredible beer. Stone has yet to let me down.

4.7
matty (443) - Pennsylvania, USA - OCT 30, 2010
22 oz. bottle. Poured a golden copper color with a very thin head that disappeared quickly. The aroma was sweet, presumably from the grapes that were used, very nice. Little carbonation, with a smooth yet thick mouthfeel. Had a sweet taste with an alcohol presence in the background. A great effort, will definately look for again.

3.6
danielcurtis81 (1519) - San Diego, California, USA - OCT 30, 2010
UPDATED: APR 24, 2011 Served from a 22 oz bottle from OTM into be Stone VE glass. The appearance is a beautiful golden brown with a small disappearing white head. The aromas out of the bottle are full of Gewurztraminer and Muscat grapes, out of the glass the Belgium yeast leads to a very bready nose. The flavors start with a very Belgium flavor, buttery biscuit, and light spices. The vinous grapes characters is not as forward are expected the Belgium profile is first and the desert wine second but tasty. You get some of the vine earthy characters. The mouth is medium to full bodied. Nice brew. I love the SoCal mix with the Temecula grapes.The alcohol is a little too strong at this point but that should mellow out. Another nice offering for the VE but still a Belgium Style which isn’t my favorite. Re-tasted on 4/21/11 without overly great notes but the grape profile is coming forward a lot more and more melded together. The yeast is settling out more too. A crisp and creamy mouth a this point.

3.4
Slipstream (2675) - USA - OCT 30, 2010
UPDATED: NOV 2, 2010 An ale brewed with wine grapes. Hmmm.... I liked Stone’s wine barrel-aged recent special release. Lovely, lambent orange pour. Sweet, winey, floral aroma that is very nice, nicer than most wines for sure. Now for the flavor. It reminds me of some of Dogfish Head’s vinous releases. They did not forget to add hops to this. The taste is complex, with a mixture of bitter, sour, and sweet elements that makes me think of cranberries. There is a little too much going on in the flavor. If white wine and beer were an awesome combination, somebody would have discovered it already. Good, but not great.


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page  1 « 50 51 52  53  54 55 56 » 64
Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5