on tap

Regional Distribution

Add Distribution Data
RATINGS: 1720   WEIGHTED AVG: 3.61/5   EST. CALORIES: 162   ABV: 5.4%
Deep amber in color, Stone Pale Ale is robust and full flavored. A delicate hop aroma is complemented by a rich maltiness.

Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

   AROMA 7/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 16/20
billk (353) - Coeur dAlene, Idaho, USA - MAR 16, 2004
bottle, 22oz. Clear medium amber/copper in color with a big beige/tan head that fell down a bit too soon, moderate lace. Nose is fresh with roasted caramel and nice subtle hop aroma. Sweet, malty, almost stickey, fresh roasted amber/caramel flavor complemented nicely with fresh hops. Rich, creamy, clean, straight foreward, quality flavor. Just entering the full bodied category. Like being in a tasting room of a quality brewery. Amazing that it came from a bottle. I prefer a drier, more bitter, spicier ale but this is definately on my drink again list.

   AROMA 7/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 8/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 14/20
igneous1 (1535) - Davenport, Iowa, USA - FEB 23, 2004
acquired from cquiroga. color is hazy, orangey copper. head is thin, light beige. hops in the aroma are mildly citrusy, mildly earthy. flavor is not as i expected, there is a slight roasty quality and a grainy quality. citrusiness (not even a word!) doesn't really show up in the flavor. thanks to cquiroga!

   AROMA 7/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 8/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 18/20
SG (465) - Valley Center, California, USA - FEB 17, 2004
A nice subtle hop and malt aroma with an orange hue and a small head. Slightly sweet and fresh on the nose as well. It starts out carbonated, goes into a sweeter malty middle, and then finishes with a nice hop presence. The bitterness always persists and even gets stronger through the glass. There aren't many bad things you could say about this beer. Very solid and drinkable.

   AROMA 7/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 14/20
steview (1037) - Petaluma, California, USA - FEB 13, 2004
UPDATED: MAY 14, 2005 fantastic! "familiar stone hop bite" with a cleaner, watery complement that aids a simple idea. not herbal, not belgian-like, just clean micro fun. nice. no crazy grapefruit flavor, caramel festival, etc... its good, clean and simple. i wish this is available everywhere, itd be my pale ale. / UPDATE from San Diego trip last weekend: i bought a 6r, and even on tap, there seemed to be this tap water quality that i didnt like, and it was a bit like granite. meh. downrated.

   AROMA 9/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 15/20
BigBastard (668) - L.A., California, USA - FEB 12, 2004
That familiar Stone hop bite is there right at the beginning, but it smooths out to a nice drinkable brew. Tastes like a tame Arrogant Bastard.

   AROMA 8/10   APPEARANCE 5/5   TASTE 8/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 15/20
Enniskillen (2046) - Salinas, California, USA - JAN 26, 2004
UPDATED: FEB 19, 2004 I thought as far as the looks for my ideal beer this hit it right on. The bitterness was present during the entire beer, hops, and malt are definatly present, a pretty good beer.

   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 8/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 15/20
Beaver (1692) - Fort Collins, Colorado, USA - DEC 31, 2003
The Stone Pale Ale poured a slightly cloudy, copper-orange with a medium off-white head that quickly went to a lacing that stuck to the glass on the way down. It had a faint grassy, hoppy smell. The initial taste was some bitterness with a touch of citrus. It had a pretty strong bitter finish that mellowed as I drank it (the draft version was also mellower and smoother). Overall, this was a fine specimen of a pale ale, which is not my favorite style.

   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 13/20
FlacoAlto (4173) - Tucson, Arizona, USA - DEC 4, 2003
A nice, slightly hazy, copper color. Pours with a dense white head. Not as aromatic as I was hoping. There is a nice bitterness up front, as I take my first sip, it is accompanied by some biscuit - malty notes. There seems to be a lot of complexity missing here. A straight forward pale ale with not real defining characteristics. It is not balanced enough to work on a subtle level. It is certainly bitter, fairly clean flavors (light fruit, malt and some hoppy flavor contributions). Seems to be missing that certain Stone 'pizzazz'. Overall a decent beer, but I was hoping for something with a bit more definition. I need to see if I can get a known fresh bottle of this, to see if perhaps this is just past it's prime.

   AROMA 8/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 8/10   PALATE 5/5   OVERALL 15/20
BckDich (5464) - McCall, Idaho, USA - NOV 26, 2003
Deep crimson amber color with a nice layer of puffy head and a small skim of lacing. The aroma is lightly hoppy with a sweet, almost caramel mix with an almost cinnamon nose. Flavor is perfectly balanced with this mainstream stone offering. This is a great beer which could be the "redefined" SNPA of past hoppy lore.

   AROMA 8/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 8/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 16/20
Sham (1844) - Seattle, Washington, USA - NOV 26, 2003
Pours a very clear mahogany, with a nice white head of small bubbles, and some pretty good lacing. Wow, the aroma is nicely balanced with hops and malt. Very mellow in both aspects. Big flavors of malt and aroma. Both bombard the senses, but it is in a pleasing way. Very smooth palate and a nice, bitter finish. Definately a damn fine pale ale

We Want To Hear From You

Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »

Page  1 « 157 158 159  160  161 162 163 » 172
Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5