Dixen (1465) - Flagstaff, Arizona, USA - DEC 25, 2004
mmm... Hops! And lots of them, citrusy and piney aroma. Nice looking amber to orange body with a medium creamy off-white head. Loads of bitterness in the flavor, some underlying caramel, ends dryish. Not complex enough, MillStreetMan (152) - Toronto, Ontario, CANADA - DEC 24, 2004
After all of the talk of the Ruination’s hoppiness, I have to admit that I was a bit let down by the end result. It smells and looks amazing, and tastes nearly as good, but somehow does not quite live up to the hype. Having said that, unattainable hype notwithstanding, it is an excellent IPA, quite bitter and hoppy without being overbearingly so. It has a refreshing citrus-y flavour, and is an exceptional standard-bearer for the style - just not quite what I expected. SpudClampDawg (1029) - Jasper, Indiana, USA - DEC 20, 2004
A clear amber pour. Super duper hoppy. Great IPA - lots of citrus in the finish. ontario102 (794) - Boise, Idaho, USA - DEC 19, 2004
pretty well balanced IPA; doesn’t seem like a 100 IBU brew; solid bready toasty malting with a heavy citrus finish. A damn fine IPA. footbalm (1219) - Western Minneapolis Suburbs, Minnesota, USA - DEC 19, 2004
Almost clear golden amber brew with a thin layer of white foamy head.If this was perfume it would be really expensive.Elegant aroma,luscious aroma of floral hops and piney citrus.Hedonism. pure,plain and simple.
jtw (1163) - farmington, Michigan, USA - DEC 18, 2004
22 oz bottle thanks to secret santa! pours a light clear amber with a big frothy head. smells almost like candy, artificial grape juice aroma, tons of malt and hops. good god, it almost seems like they just liquefied an entire vine of west coast hops. definitely ruins your palate--excellent beer. a good first impression from stone brewing! Dough77 (821) - Aurora, Illinois, USA - DEC 14, 2004
oops, i think i just burped up a hops cone. at least that’s what it still tastes like.
Excellent IIPA, super hopped up in both the aroma and taste. As it warmed the alcohol became aLOT more present, but was great. Sweet with a nice bitterness to it. But overall a IIPA i wish was more accesible in Illinois, because it would definitly be on my regular list. giarcsr (104) - San Diego, California, USA - DEC 14, 2004
Golden amber color with a really hoppyt aroma to it. It has a good hoppy taste and not too much of a lingering aftertaste. Flavor is good and smooth. Overall a solid double IPA from stone, but would you expect anything less. Lubiere (13905) - Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA - DEC 13, 2004
Golden ale with no head. Light hops aroma Rather nice hops and malts, light citrus. Good bitterness but not ruinating. Good balance and body. (Sept. 2004) OlJuntan64 (1265) - Perth, AUSTRALIA - DEC 12, 2004
Very slightly hazy amber with not much of a short lasting off white head. Strong honey floral nectar, almonds and fresh hop pellet and woody stem aroma. Medium smooth body. Initial flavour impact is one of mouth stripping bitter. My drinking buddies were concerned that it would etch the gold label off the Duvel glasses we were drinking from. There’s no doubt about the seriously strong bitter but there’s much much more to this beer than just bitter. There’s a fair bit of matching treacly malty sweetness and the hops have a spectrum of floral and industrial strength cleaner flavours all of which nicely mask the highish ABV. I’m not sure I could drink too many of these in a row and for all round drinkability I still favour the regular Stone IPA