overall
5
50
style

bottling
unknown

on tap
available

Broad Distribution

Add Distribution Data
RATINGS: 1534   WEIGHTED AVG: 2.13/5   EST. CALORIES: 150   ABV: 5%
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
World acclaimed lager beer. Awarded championship gold medals in London, Geneva and Paris.

Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5


2.4
   AROMA 8/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 5/20
beervana (781) - Libertyville, Illinois, USA - APR 17, 2006
(04.01.06) On tap at the Four Seasons coffee shop, Hotel Kunlun, Beijing, China. Clear golden yellow with diminishing large white head. Average carbonation. Sweet malt aroma. Light-to-medium bodied beer that starts with light malt sweetness and corn flavor. Some sourness detected. Infected beer or tap line? Finishes with light hop bitterness and malt fade. A rather mediocre pale ale. The bottled version was better tasting.

2.2
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 9/20
Aurelius (5178) - Tallahassee, Florida, USA - APR 8, 2006
Slightly skunky aroma with some off grain smells. Very pale gold, webby head. Very good label and cap. In fact, the label and cap were the high point of this beer. Sweetish, under-hopped, skunky malting. Thin.

2.1
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 7/20
nick76 (4387) - Tampa, Florida, USA - APR 8, 2006
The aroma has malt and no detectable hops. The appearance is pale gold with a small head. The flavor is mildly bitter and malty. Its uncomplicated except for a toasted herb bread taste that is also present. The palate is thin. There is nothing bad here and there is nothing all that good either. There just isnt all that much to report.

1.6
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 4/20
destroye7 (312) - Montreal, Quebec, CANADA - APR 1, 2006
330 ml bottle. Medium yellowish going to orange color. Good head after pouring but lost it within 5 mins. Skunk aroma. Low carbonation. A bit sour but it doesnt really taste something.

1.1
   AROMA 1/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 2/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 3/20
CTwriter (34) - USA - MAR 27, 2006
Poured from a bottle at Double Happiness, a cool underground bar in Manhattans NoLiTa nabe. It smelled stinky, and I thought it might be skunked. The bartender assured me that thats what it was supposed to smell like. The taste was only a little bit better. I had it without food, which I think was also a mistake. Not one Id return to.

1.6
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 5/20
highlandlad (1480) - Blue Mountains, AUSTRALIA - MAR 27, 2006
Catfight: Tiger Lager vs Tiger Special Classic Edition rated head to head in an unsensational winner-takes-bugger-all contest. This one-off all-Singaporean bout comes courtesy of Bridge (Classic Edition) and Nice Houseguest With Poor Taste In Beer (Tiger Lager). Does Tiger Lager have the claws to see off the Classic Edition? Or will the CEs vaunted addition of crystal malt turn the contest? Does anyone care? Lets find out... Appearance (both poured simultaneously into identical chalices): a clear win for Classic Edition. TL arrives with a watery gold body and skinny head that vanishes immediately. CE is brighter, deeper and has a head that not only lasts but also laces. TL 2/5, CE 4/5. Aroma: TL is sugary sweet, with cardboardy malt. Uninspiring. Can it get worse? Surprisingly, yes. CE smells stale, despite being well within its consume-by date. Its fruity, with some wet dog. TL 3, CE 2. Palate: TL is surprisingly oily, with a dry finish. CE is fizzier. TL 3/5, CE 3/5. Flavour: TL is all sugary cornwater, with faint banana and a dry, mildly grainy finish. CE benefits from the crystal malt, but marginally. It has Juicy Fruit chewing gum and canned pear notes. Its much maltier and just as sweet. TL 3/10, CE 4/10. Overall: I expected the Lager to win this hands down, but there was no contest. The CE is no classic, despite the name, but its superior in most aspects. Total Scores: Tiger Lager 1.6, Classic Edition 2.0. (Tiger Lager: 330ml bottle, bb Dec 2006; Classic Edition: 330ml can, brewed Dec 30, 2005)

1.8
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 7/20
mongkut4 (132) - Florida, USA - MAR 22, 2006
Im amazed that I have heard so many positive reviews of this beer. It was colossally disappointing. Very little flavor and a watery palate. Give me a Singha, Tsingtao, or a Kirin Ichiban any day over this. I may deserve a caning for saying this but Sillipore needs to stick to business trade and stay out of brewing.

1
   AROMA 2/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 2/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 4/20
ebarnes (261) - Beech Grove, Indiana, USA - MAR 17, 2006
UPDATED: JUN 13, 2007 Bottle in Singapore, Draft in Beijing
Neither very remarkable. Pale, clear yellow with soapy white head. Not much aroma or taste.

2
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 8/20
HenrikSoegaard (13638) - Randers, DENMARK - MAR 17, 2006
Bottle. OK pale lager. Frothy white good mostly deminishing head. Yellow colour. OK aroma and flavor, A little watery.

2.8
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 11/20
DJMonarch (9179) - Northwich, Cheshire, ENGLAND - MAR 12, 2006
Bottle at the Penny Black, Northwich (JDW) 29/10/2004 Clear golden coloured with fruit and hop aromas. Crisp slightly dry malt finish.


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page  1 « 122 123 124  125  126 127 128 » 154
Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5