overall
4
46
style
RATINGS: 139   WEIGHTED AVG: 2.08/5   EST. CALORIES: 156   ABV: 5.2%
No commercial description

Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5


1.5
beerbill (3618) - Laurel, New York, USA - OCT 24, 2005
12 oz. can. Pours a light yellow with a fizzy white head. Very, very light aroma. Not much flavor to speak of. Does anyone remember the days when F.X. Matt brewed "Maximus Super"?!!

1.5
jb (3253) - Rochester, New York, USA - OCT 22, 2005
No head, yellow, decent floral aroma. No foul tastes , points for that, but pretty darn light and inoffensive.

1
wilkie (1208) - Raleigh, North Carolina, USA - OCT 9, 2005
Bottle. Stale aroma, weak malt smell, no hops. Pale, golden with small head. Flavor is weak, watery, and has little of what the label calls "pilsner". Crappy beer. I am not sure it is worse than a buttwiper.

1.4
zach8270 (4022) - Henrietta, New York, USA - SEP 8, 2005
UPDATED: DEC 13, 2008 [bottle - 12 oz] Clear gold pour with a foamy head. Very bitter and sour aroma with metallic hints. The flavor is sweet at the beginning and then metallic and dry. Very unpleasant. It gets extra points however for being a historically significant beer.

0.5
ThirstyDave (23) - Thompsons Station, Tennessee, USA - AUG 10, 2005
Not so great. The Matt Brewing Co makes excellent beer. This throw back to pre prohibition days is not an example of their talent.

1.7
JFGrind (2047) - Glenside, Pennsylvania, USA - JUL 21, 2005
Bought a twelve pack in Binghamton, NY for under five bucks. Piss water appearance with short foam, and few bubbles. I’ll give it extra points for being a classic beer resurrected, but its "absolutely chemical tasting swill".

2.3
Drew (2411) - Kent, Ohio, USA - JUN 28, 2005
Chris always talks about the good old days of Shulz and Duli (sp?), so when I found this at a beverage store near the beach in North Carolina, I just had to get some to share wth him. It’s basically a light lager with not too much of an adjunct presence, well carbonated, a very little bit of hop dryness at the end.

5
[email protected] (2) - Alexandria, Virginia, USA - JUN 14, 2005 does not count
Great beer., great taste not bloating I wish I could find it in northern VA.

1.1
DYCSoccer17 (3697) - Woodland, California, USA - MAY 28, 2005
Can. Grassy, sour skunked yeast in the nose. Pretty darn sour nose. Transparent apple juice color with a small quickly dissipating false white head. Start is kind of sweet turning sour and metallic to finish. A strange bitterness lingers....Pretty rough stuff...

2.2
MikeT (76) - Hollis, New Hampshire, USA - APR 28, 2005
UPDATED: FEB 16, 2008 A blond pur with typical carbonated head and lace. A slightly sweet aroma that brings back memories of past days in upstate NY and SU. Not bad for a mass produced beer. The new version of this beer is rather smooth and creamy and the "headache in every beer" is gone!


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page  1 « 8 9 10  11  12 13 14
Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5