mattandmaney (4) - AUSTRALIA - JAN 12, 2004 does not count
VB is a bland but good to drink when watching the cricket with mates or Aussie rules footy just a relaxing beer Sanchex (224) - Toronto, Ontario, CANADA - DEC 27, 2003
Somewhat reminiscent of a Canadian macrobrew. Nothing complex but somewhat easy drinking if it's ice cold. inenigma (10) - sydney, AUSTRALIA - DEC 21, 2003
Completely lacking in everything and anything. Bland, no hop presence and a definite chemical aftertaste. Not really woth being rated... BeerJohn (10) - AUSTRALIA - DEC 15, 2003
Bland. Cheap highly drinkable beer. Lacks unique character and flavours. One of last choice options.
Trogdor (197) - Cairns, AUSTRALIA - DEC 14, 2003
horrible beer, drink as cold as possible if you must drink it at all, terrible hop and malt flavours make for a terrible beer, cheap rubbish
rlgk (18850) - Göteborg, SWEDEN - DEC 14, 2003
It surprises me a little to see the low ratings on this one. I find it quite ok. Golden with a nice and rather creamy head. Aroma is hoppy and with some citrus. Has a maild and fruity flavor. Ends with a sweet finish that brings some almond late. DanielBrown (4502) - Birmingham (via Leicester), West Midlands, ENGLAND - DEC 9, 2003
Bottle. Initial bubblegum hint, then a malty, almost vodk-y flvaour, before a bland finish. Quite crisp and nice lacing. KBeer (117) - Chicago, Illinois, USA - NOV 30, 2003
Oz has much better brews to offer than this one. I think I know where the term 'piss' for beer came from. It does the job on a hot WA afternoon in the summer though. lobsha (1) - USA - OCT 25, 2003 does not count
Quite a bland beer. Usually the first beer a young boy or girl will drink on the mainstream, however the taste and aftertaste is very poor and can result in one being sick. Quite a bitter taste, and is only good for a cheap piss up. SteveWood (11) - AUSTRALIA - OCT 7, 2003
A great comercial mainstream beer but a poor flavoured beer. Very bland, sweet and uninspiring.