overall
28
20
style
Brewed by Woods
Style: Premium Bitter/ESB
Craven Arms, England
Serve in English pint

bottling
unknown

on tap
unknown

distribution
unknown

Add Distribution Data
RATINGS: 121   WEIGHTED AVG: 2.9/5   EST. CALORIES: 141   ABV: 4.7%
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
Cask; Seasonal - Spring. Also available bottle conditioned all year.
Hopping Mad uses just one single hop variety, Progress, to achieve its appealing aroma, its pleasingly bitter taste and its delightful sparkle. We believe the result is uniquely enjoyable. So did the judges at the Beauty of Hops Awards, who awarded it a Silver Medal.

Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5


2.5
joergen (28771) - Frederiksberg, DENMARK - MAY 23, 2005
Bottled at DBF 2005. Amber coloured with a white head. Aroma of caramel and malts. Malty flavour with notes of caramel and grass. OK hoppy finish.

2.9
Dalle (1145) - Skørping, DENMARK - APR 22, 2005
Bottle. Golden-amber, cloudy with tiny head. Earth, citrus, leather, mineral, good balance.

3
johndoughty (5504) - cheslyn hay, West Midlands, ENGLAND - MAR 29, 2005
Slightly cloudy and not as hoppy as I had expected from the bottles label. Dissapointing

3.4
TC2642 (265) - Worcester, Worcestershire, ENGLAND - NOV 27, 2004
Bottle. I got a lot of citrus and orange in this, some sherbert. I also found it quite smooth and fairly light.

3.1
imdownthepub (14983) - Banbury, Oxfordshire, ENGLAND - NOV 9, 2004
Bottle Conditioned. Amber colour with short lasting head. Bitter citric hop notes, a beer with a one track message and that is a big hop note. Dry, grassy with some apricot, but mostly hops.

1.7
Ungstrup (38148) - Citizen of the universe, DENMARK - SEP 9, 2004
An amber beer with an OK, but disappearing white head. The aroma is weird with spices and hop notes, doesn’t the weirdness come from the Progress hops? The flavor is very hoppy and very weird with a dry end. I wonder if it is the Progress hops, that makes this beer weird?

2.7
Spiesy (2338) - Sydney, Greater London, AUSTRALIA - JUL 9, 2004
Bottled. Golden, foggy from the stirred sediment of its days travel. Citrus hop aroma. Citrus bitterness and tang. More yeasty tang. Possibly better if not drunk by a greedy drunk without patience.

3
BrainDead (30) - Derby, ENGLAND - MAY 13, 2004
Light and fragrant. An easy drinking golden bitter with clean flavours from an average brewery.

2.9
chriso (7583) - London, Greater London, ENGLAND - MAY 12, 2004
UPDATED: JUN 12, 2008 I expected something tangy and citric but, although this was perfectly acceptable, nothing really leapt out and grabbed me. Everything was a bit restrained and muted. Pale amber colour, faint lemony hop aroma and vague sweet & sour finish. Overall, rather short on flavour and lacking in zing. Not bad but I agree with Gazza that an extra shot of hops wouldn’t have gone amiss. Cask (handpump), Lord Moon of the Mall (JDW), Whitehall, London SW1. RE-RATE 500ml bottle. No BBE date but probably rather old. Dull creeal malt aroma. Touch of citrus in the flavour with moderate bitterness. Rather dull mouthfeel with very little condition. Seemed very tired. 5/3/5/3/10. Original rating retained.

3
maeib (8749) - Wootton, Northampton, Northamptonshire, ENGLAND - MAY 11, 2004
Bottled. Is this BC? The bottle doesn’t say so and it doesn’t behave like one. The aroma is very interesting. A sort of spritzy apples and caramel smell. The beer is mid brown and has no head. The taste reminds me of a saison; it is slightly salty and apple-like and is quite interesting and tasty,


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10  11  12 13
Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5