overall
4
45
style
RATINGS: 437   WEIGHTED AVG: 2.07/5   EST. CALORIES: 114   ABV: 3.8%
No commercial description

Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5


1.9
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 8/20
morrdt (715) - Dirty Mo, North Carolina, USA - JAN 21, 2006
Nothing like its big brother, this is rather weak an not very special. A bit watery, like all light beers, and this is for the ladies.

1.9
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 5/20
Casteel420 (59) - Bristol, Virginia, USA - JAN 17, 2006
Not bad for a domestic light beer. Very cheap around here ($4/6er). Not much taste or aroma to speak of...

2.1
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 9/20
beerbill (3605) - Laurel, New York, USA - JAN 13, 2006
12 oz. can. Pours very similar to the lager, except the white fizzy head disappeared much quicker. Not much aroma to speak of. Thinner, watered down flavor as compared to their regular lager, but then again it is a light beer. Better than 95% of the light beers on the market.

1.8
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 6/20
biznizness (1128) - Charlotte, North Carolina, USA - JAN 8, 2006
Not too good...in fact, BAD. Definitely not up to par with the regular lager, but I guess that is no surprise. Pass on this one.

1.7
   AROMA 2/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 6/20
MattShizzle (604) - Bernville, Pennsylvania, USA - JAN 2, 2006
Not good. This is definitely the worst from Yuengling. Why would a good brewery like this degrade themself by making a light beer? Give me chesterfield ale any day!

1.6
   AROMA 2/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 7/20
waveman352 (178) - Saratoga Springs, New York, USA - DEC 25, 2005
12 oz. bottle 12/24/05. A pretty good light beer. Definatly similar to that of the traditional lager. More watered down and nothing to great. Other than apperaling to light beer drinkers its not all that great. For sure one of the best light beers ive tried obviously behind Samuel Adams Light.

1.8
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 6/20
ChazyRPh (583) - Chazy, New York, USA - DEC 21, 2005
bottle...crystal clear light amber color with fizzy white head that totally disappears in less than a minute. Malty aroma, with a slight DMS presence. Kind of earthy malt aroma. Malty flavors, not a lot of character. Minimal if any hop presence, I actually taste none, certainly not offensive, but unimpressive. Would be a good session beer, not unlike what I expected.

1.9
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 7/20
Beerman6686 (6435) - Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA - DEC 7, 2005
aroma is decent much like normal yuengling, appearance is pretty light, flavor is alot like rolling rock but with a better after taste, palate is watery though

3.2
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 12/20
Ritterkreuz (179) - Seneca Falls, New York, USA - DEC 1, 2005
A good beer, but not the best, if you like light beers its definately worth a try.

1.2
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 1/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 3/20
zdeuce (3) - USA - NOV 23, 2005 does not count
Its definately a light beer. Disappointing as I like Yuengling lager. Watered down version of the regular lager. If you like Yuengling, and are trying to stick to light beers, I guess this might be ok, but otherwise I would say stay away.


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page  1 « 32 33 34  35  36 37 38 » 44
Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5