zach8270 (4022) - Henrietta, New York, USA - DEC 30, 2003
2.2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
UPDATED: DEC 12, 2008 [bottle] Pale gold color reminiscent of nearly every other light beer I have tried. Not much of an aroma and a very watery taste. Good carbonation and a slightly sweet taste. I will stick with the lager though.
Frank (4117) - Chicago, Illinois, USA - DEC 26, 2003
2.2 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
Headless, pale golden. Nose is slightly sweet with a hint of toffee. A bit of diacetyl unpleasantness. Light to medium bodied with brisk carbonation. More flavorful than many light beers but still not very good.
haddon90 (1633) - Newport Beach, California, USA - DEC 22, 2003
2.4 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
Light copper color with hardly any head at all. Super Light. Some malt and hop characeristics in the flavor and taste. Smooth and watered down. Overall not bad.
Kinz (3786) - Glen Allen, Virginia, USA - NOV 9, 2003
1.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Fizzy gold, aroma of very light floral hops and perhpas a touch of corn. Strange, rather full mouthfeel, what did they add to give it this much body? Still a faint bit of corn, but I really can't complain about the spicy floral hops that came along gently on the finish. Not too bad for a light.
ClarkVV (6296) - Boston, Massachusetts, USA - JUL 17, 2003
3.4 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 15/20
UPDATED: JAN 15, 2004 Probably the best light beer made, one of them anyways. Taste is crystal clear, with no cereal/grainy taste. Has a bit of a sour malt taste to go along with it, on the finish. Clean and crisp and what a light beer should be.
Aurelius (5199) - Tallahassee, Florida, USA - JUN 21, 2003
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
This is a very servicable lite beer. Parched malt aroma. A smidge tart. A hop or two. Fizzy. Lame appearance marks, but this is better than your average macro light. Better since Yuengling started putting stuff in a brown bottle, rather than green here in FL.
beastdog75 (364) - Brick, New Jersey, USA - MAR 18, 2003
1.7 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 6/20
The smell reminded me of Lone Star, and it was almost as watery as Coors Light. Although I am not a fan of light beers, I prefer the Yuengling Light Lager (the light version of Yuengling Traditional) over this stuff.
PorterPounder (7716) - Tallahassee, Florida, USA - MAR 10, 2003
2.5 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Better than your average macro light - bit of hoppiness to it. Cheap beer aroma, little to no head. If I need to drink a light though - this is not a bad choice.
jhart2 (19) - USA - MAR 6, 2003
1.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Not bad for a lite beer. I didn't feel like I was drinking 9 ounces of beer with 3 ounces of water. Still, though, just an American lite.
krdktq (17) - Pennsylvania, USA - FEB 19, 2003
1.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
A typical light beer. A lot of carbonation and a little taste. No better or worse then anything else on the market.If you like lite beer you will like this, if you don't you won't. I don't.