RATINGS: 156   WEIGHTED AVG: 1.98/5   EST. CALORIES: 126   ABV: 4.2%
A full bodied premium light beer with only 98 calories.

A tick is a star rating
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

MrBunn (2865) - The Wet Side of a Dry Town, Pennsylvania, USA - AUG 1, 2007
Bottle. So if you took a normal Yuengling and got rid of most of the pleasantness in terms of malt and hops aroma and flavor, this is what you would be left with. Weak and uninteresting. Poor... very poor.

jcwattsrugger (12559) - Florida and, New Jersey, USA - JUL 24, 2007
12 oz bottle-pours a dissipating white head and yellow color. Aroma is macro light lager, grain-some sweet (corn?). taste is Grain-some sweet, faint light hops, which come in the finish as flat. A bit of crispness/musty and a bit thin/huskiness. OK/mild carbonation.

bbp182 (255) - Levittown, Pennsylvania, USA - JUN 26, 2007
This has less flavor then miller lite. How is that possible? No real smell or taste. Just blah.

PhillyBeer2112 (2919) - Oviedo, Florida, USA - MAY 21, 2007
Bottle, as Yuengling Light. Not too bad for a light lager. Yellow gold color, a thin but tight and creamy head. Aroma is mostly bready (distinctly rye), with a touch of musty hop. Fizzy palate, again very bready, with an empty finish. Light palate, flavorful but still boring.

obxdude10 (2391) - Pottstown, Pennsylvania, USA - APR 23, 2007
Just like the regular Premium beer from Yuengling this certainly doesn’t deserve the label, straw in color, corn & rice in the nose, very little head on the beer, what was there disappeared rather quickly, hardly any lacing left around the glass, skunky flavors, watery, way too light in body, drank like carbonated water, fizzy mouthfeel, bland finish, corn in the aftertaste, not a good beer at all

whaleman (2178) - North Wales, Pennsylvania, USA - MAR 18, 2007
Clear pale straw body with a sudsy white head. Aroma of raw corn, grain, a pale nutty Yuengling signature, and some apparent acetaldehyde. Mostly dry and banal with some funky lager yeast properties. Thin, watery texture. Bleh.

jonwayne4883 (401) - Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA - FEB 18, 2007
premium? nope. light? maybe? good? definitely not. blech. waste of time. watery watery watery.

Sancho (245) - Da Bronx, New York, USA - FEB 14, 2007
12oz can, goldoen color no head . a cit of a corny grainy taste light bodied,DUH.overall a good light beer it just so happens that light beers suck

blinesam (235) - USA - JAN 11, 2007
I could probably give this beer a lower rating but im being generous to not piss of my friends at Delaware since they love yuengling. This beer tastes bitter, spoiled, tart and all those other words that tell you it sucks. The smell is actually not horrible which is misleading. The 98 calories is most likely the only reason to drink it...or if its free.

mansquito (7127) - Nueva York, New York, USA - OCT 31, 2006
It tastes like the lager, but with less flavour and less alcohol. Unless you like the fact that this has low calories, there is no reason to choose this above the far superior lager.

We Want To Hear From You

Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »

Page  1 « 6 7 8  9  10 11 12 » 17
A tick is a star rating
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5