Originally posted by JoeMcPhee Joe - how much does the local water play into this? From what I understand, the mineral profile in the UK tends to be 1) in general higher than most American ground water 2) regionally specific. Maybe this is something that american brewers just can’t recapitulate due to this factor. It would be pretty inefficient to import water from England just to get a bitter right. |
They have salts and other things you can add to your mash for a reason. |
I just want to say that to compare something like bottled Fullers over here to your local versions is a mistake. Fullers cask in London is a lot closer to many American versions, which come out leaner and hoppier because they are fresh and non-pasteurized, unlike imported bottles. I think that a lot of the roundness and fruity-malty notes that people get here in English versions is just the effects of old, pasteurized beer. |
There is no such style as ESB. The only reason you lot think there is is Fuller’s ESB has been exported over to the US for years and Jackson championed it. |
From what I understand anything over 4.8% is considered an ESB. |
Originally posted by Gazza That may be because Fullers protect the trademark assiduously. There are, of course, plenty of strong bitters. |
Originally posted by SamGamgee Yep |
Originally posted by chriso Plenty. But not many (very few) fit the criteria for ESB’s in the US. |
Originally posted by chriso Yes and no - I’ve been the UK many times and although the freshness of the hops certainly affect the taste, what I’m talking about are not the bottled/canned versions we get. It’s still true that the US versions (generally, not always) have a cleaner, less interesting malt component. |
In the UK I feel there is a overlap of the styles and some breweries would call their beer a Premium bitter just to differentiate it from their regular cask bitter. Why? So they can charge a little bit More. |
2000- 2024 © RateBeer, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service