Evil Twin Iperial Biscotti Break - Fruit Beer and Spice Herb Veg !

Reads 1996 • Replies 39 • Started Saturday, February 22, 2014 1:35:06 AM CT

The forums you're viewing are the static, archived version. You won't be able to post or reply here.
Our new, modern forums are here:
RateBeer Forums

Thread Frozen
beers 21466 º places 1047 º 01:35 Sat 2/22/2014



Now I could have sworn when I rated these beers they were imperial/strong porter in terms of style, so I presume an admin has changed them.

Apoligies if I’ve missed a post on this matter but why are they now Fruit beer and Spice herb veg ? Yes I can clearly see what the additional ingredients are but these beers still hold up as imeperial strong porters with additions that add a twist to the flavour.

Is there a new directive with admins that any additional ingredients results in the beer having to leave the original base style?

Consider this ... Who, of the folks who have rated the above, sat down and said to themselves ’yeah - great Spice / Herb / Veg beer!’

There’s been the ’Session IPA’ debate in recent weeks, which doesn’t bother me, however I thought this was to align with marketing trends from brewers and bars?

So with that same marketing hat on do you really think bars are going to advertise a 10% Imperial Porter as a ’Fruit beer’ ????

01:39 Sat 2/22/2014

So all beers with Chilies are now Herb/Spice???

beers 419 º places 32 º 04:32 Sat 2/22/2014

Yeah that’s definitely wrong. And certainly inconsistent with these standards:


beers 3514 º places 153 º 05:04 Sat 2/22/2014

poor form

beers 1606 º places 115 º 05:50 Sat 2/22/2014

Pretty inaccurate, especially for the Decicco version. It’s not a chile beer with a porter background by any means; it’s an imperial porter with a subtle spice for depth.

beers 9367 º places 1571 º 07:07 Sat 2/22/2014

They were last edited by Jeppe.


beers 419 º places 32 º 08:57 Sat 2/22/2014

Originally posted by 3fourths
They were last edited by Jeppe.


Anything to be number one in style, huh?

beers 9497 º places 1139 º 08:59 Sat 2/22/2014

Oh, come on. I certainly understand the importance of brewer intent, but there are still style guidelines on the site. It he called one of these an American pale ale, would you have the same response?

beers 9367 º places 1571 º 09:48 Sat 2/22/2014

well no, i understand these are ales but not pale. it is a beer and it has fruit in it, so what’s wrong with fruit beer - the term describes it perfectly. and chiles in a porter? that’s a flavored beer, so what’s wrong with S/H/V?

beers 10017 º places 672 º 09:55 Sat 2/22/2014


beers 9497 º places 1139 º 11:43 Sat 2/22/2014

Originally posted by MaxxDaddy
Anything to be number one in style, huh?


The world is full of chili stouts and porters that are classified by the base beer. I guess perhaps the fault is ours, because reading the description it only says that the additive must be "noticeable" . I would prefer a style classification that requires that the spice/herb/vegetable be the dominant characteristic before it is categorized as such. Otherwise we need to have a mass migration of Bomb, Hunaphu, Abraxas, you name it to the S/H/V category