What do you think of the changes? I’m wondering how you would judge a "clone brew." This seems like a train wreck waiting to happen. Maybe they could provide the commercial example so you could judge them side-by-side? |
A bunch of them are dum a dum dum. I think that some categories, "Brett Beer" in particular, are going to have some issues. |
The biggest issue I see is that you can’t recapitulate what a beer should be like from any document - you need to get out there, travel and find them. It’s not easy and very few people will do it, BJCP judge or not. |
IPAs can be a combination of every color imaginable and be session/regular/double. Session Brown IPA sounds atrocious. |
WTF is an Australian sparkling ale? |
This seems like WAY too many changes to institute in one update… some of them I like, but others I’m like whaaa? I’d hate to be a judge and have to test this minefield. |
Originally posted by BoostIPA A very obscure style. Looks like there is only one commercial example available today? Ratebeer calls the currently available example a Golden/Blonde Ale. COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION Coopers Sparkling Ale is brewed naturally by the centuries-old top fermentation method just as it was in the beginning by Thomas Cooper. This beer displays a solid head and a distinctive, full-bodied flavour enhanced by a soft, fruity character and the sediment which gives it a cloudy appearance |
Hopefully, a bunch of mis-characterizations of various styles will get corrected. Joris Pattyn might even be pleased. |
My feeling is that a lot of the international styles have been fixed and black/rye IPA are out of specialty, great. |
Originally posted by bitbucket It’s a pale ale - nothing more and nothing less. Fruity yeast and moderately hoppy but it’s not a separate style. |
Originally posted by JoeMcPhee A big part of the addition was a nod to the international community. People in Australia have been hounding Gordon for years. It’s not the same. The lineage is closer to standard cream ale than apa. As to the clone comment, there has ALWAYS been clone beers. The addition if the category is specifically for beers that don’t fit other styles. A clone of daisy cutter is under APA. Realistically, there shouldn’t be many entries in clone. There have been very involved discussions on the bjcp forum about this and it will shake out right. Lastly, these are a draft. The biggest change, actually, is the organization. It also is the most contested issue with the guidelines. Well, that and the Kentucky common description. Anyhow, if anybody wants to talk about this, hit me up. |
Homebrew Shops - A collection of homebrew shops and supply houses submitted by RateBeer readers
Homebrewing Articles - RateBeer Magazine's homebrewing department
Homebrew Recipes - Experiment, share and post your own homebrew recipes
2000- 2024 © RateBeer, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service