Hey all |
I’ve rated 109 (of 117), but for some reason I appear as #6 on the list. |
Originally posted by Travlr I think 6th on the list isn’t 6th place. 6th on the list for me is me, for example (at a meagre 89). However, your point about 109 being a larger number than the figure for the alleged top 5 has teeth. |
I’ve noticed some of the beers added twice, but don’t appear able to remove duplicates |
Originally posted by FatPhil the list is top 5 raters of the tag plus yourself. I thought there used to be a break to demarcate the logged user from the top 5. |
Originally posted by Beersiveknown Which ones? Has this already been corrected? |
Originally posted by joet red x click to delete used to pop up over the list centered in the browser, now the confirm div is visible at the bottom of the page. |
I have had 52 of the 100: so 52%. Although as there are 117 beers listed my percentage plummets somewhat until the duplicates are eradicated. I do have a couple of others in the book ageing a little, so although I will not be troubling the top 5 anytime soon my 52 will one day move higher a notch or two. Brugge in December this year may help too. |
A measly 49 for me, but I have had the top 16 at least, and many of the others I am sure I have had before I was a rater. Need to revisit. |
86 which isn’t bad |
98 for me. Looking at 3 random ones I haven’t had, Joris rated them 3.1, 3.4, and 3.6. Guess the list is based on aspects besides quality (haven’t seen the book). |
2000- 2024 © RateBeer, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service