Originally posted by MaxxDaddy Well, somebody is already doing the calculations in order to award the beers, right? It would be cool to see the scores for that given year attached to the beer, I agree. |
Originally posted by AdamJackson HF just got a license for on-premise consumption (aka pints). https://twitter.com/HillFarmstead/status/558101702818418688 So that’s another thing to look forward to in the coming year. |
I’m curious why Best New beers list includes the Surly and Three Floyds versions of Blakkr as their own beers. If the logic is that each released their own, I get that. But where is Real Ale Blakkr on the list? Is this simply a case of the two more well-known breweries getting included while the third, lesser hyped brewery gets left off? |
Originally posted by HeffIAm They are separate beers, all of them. It so happened the Surly and Three Floyds versions scored highly on their own, 3.84+. The Real Ale version scored 3.68, would not be in the running for Best New Beer. |
Originally posted by MaxxDaddy Each beer has a stats page but it shows the averaged out score over time instead of score by year. So currently I agree you cannot see this stat. |
Originally posted by Prufrockstar bump. I think only JoeT has the answer to this. |
Originally posted by beastiefan2k Even if 51 breweries opened in Washington State last year, which sounds extremely high and exaggerated, one of them would have to get a certain number of reviews to be on this list. Nobody rates, then nobody gets mentioned for their beer, simple. Spain being #1 on new breweries in the world may not be agreeable here as the best new brewery on earth. But people got out and rated the beer. So if there is a brewery that deserves recognition, it needs the reviewers to make it known. One critical flaw in this system is that we do not constantly re-rate beers as new reviews. So if I gave NG Raspberry Tart I high score three years ago and had it last year, but did not delete my old rating and put in a new one, then my excellent sampling of that beer is lost. Serendipity is newer, so it is boosted by having more new rates perhaps in 2014 vs Raspberry Tart and Belgian Red. So really good "old recipe" beers that have been around with us will only make this list if we get enough new reviews. If no one re-rates, then that means we also need more new reviewers who are Raspberry Tart virgins. |
@GT2: Any information on how many reviews are required? |
Originally posted by Prufrockstar There is no absolute minimum but more reviews certainly help. |
Originally posted by GT2 I can understand why you are incredulous but Washington indeed is blowing up with breweries Here is the report from a year ago http://www.washingtonbeer.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/wa-beer_2013-annual-report_PROOF-v4.pdf It was another fantastic year of growth for Washington Beer. The count of state craft breweries climbed from 162 to 204, a 26% increase Washington had 44 new breweries in 2013. at the moment, our db says there are 278 http://www.ratebeer.com/breweries/washington/47/213/ some of those are cideries or mead makers. |
2000- 2024 © RateBeer, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service