Dear Breweries...

Reads 1811 • Replies 25 • Started Wednesday, March 19, 2014 12:41:03 PM CT

The forums you're viewing are the static, archived version. You won't be able to post or reply here.
Our new, modern forums are here:
RateBeer Forums

Thread Frozen

Message Benzai beers 20020 º places 321 º 08:57 Thu 3/20/2014 Originally posted by lithy Originally posted by pepsican Makes for better acronyms, something we definitely need more of. Maybe we need more names that in their acronym become a word unto themselves? Sierra Nevada Oaked Biggie Smalls. SNOBS. My thought exactly
Message joet P admin beers 2900 º places 125 º 09:05 Thu 3/20/2014 Isn’t there a brewery with a convenient numbering system that fixes all of this?
Message Alen places 1 º 09:12 Thu 3/20/2014 Originally posted by joet Isn’t there a brewery with a convenient numbering system that fixes all of this? 6,8,10 ?

Message degbert beers 1824 º places 19 º 10:22 Thu 3/20/2014 Originally posted by HonkeyBra I have not once thought, "This beer name is too long. I should complain about it." I have, but only when trying to fit a beer into an inventory computer database entry for the retail chain I work for. But I have yet to find a beer I couldn’t make fit and make mostly understandable. Though -- yesterday, Shock Top Honey Bourbon Cask Wheat came close. It ended up something like SHOCK TOP HON BOUR WH NR.
Message bartlebier beers 4526 º places 177 º 13:13 Thu 3/20/2014 Originally posted by joet Isn’t there a brewery with a convenient numbering system that fixes all of this? Schneider Weisse introduced their beautifully arythmetical TAP (1-7) + 11. A pity only half of that easy to remember series survived in the RB listings, tackling their logic with mandatory aliases: RIP elegant "TAP 4 - Mein Grünes", enter numberless "Schneider Georg Schneiders Wiesen Edel-Weisse". Anyone else in favour of making TAP 1-4 and 11 ratebeable again (current ratings under original TAP names: 0)?