Agreed, would have done the same for those exact reasons. Seems they're growing in popularity too so absolutely expect someone will add them again next year. |
Originally posted by LazyPyro Thanks - that's very helpful! I think I added it because the website says "We brew the finest cranberries alongside apples" so I assumed that it would have been mostly apples with some cranberries thrown in. Evidently it's just some sort of cranberry derived alcopop. Always assumed Kopparberg, Rekorderlig and Old Mout were made in some dodgy way but I'm still in the dark as to how. For example, the Kopparberg website says: Kopparberg Cider comprises of a refreshing range of apple, pear and fruit ciders. These are made from the fermentation of apples or pears and the finest soft water, locally sourced in the town of Kopparberg, Sweden. So I guess either they are lying or just fermenting a small quantity of what becomes the finished product? |
I quoted some stuff earlier in this thread somewhere about Kopparberg specifically. On both their UK and US websites the way they describe the cider is worded strangely and as chriso and others explained they don't seem to be making cider in the traditional way and don't explicitly claim to be doing so either, but I must admit I don't know too much about that subject at all. |
Originally posted by LazyPyro If I remember correctly there's some sort of lablling regulation in (some of?) the Scandinavian countries that specifies the proportion of actual apple-derived ingredients required for a product to be labeled as cider. That figure is very low indeed, I forget what it is exactly. I assume that apples/apple juice are relatively expensive in those countries, resulting in lower production costs for the more industrial producers by keeping the apple content as low as possible and deriving the alcohol from other sources. Presumably, they also see a commercial benefit in describing a product as cider when it has very little real apple content. In the UK there are, as far as I'm aware, no specific labelling requirements. Even if there were, we don't really have any authority responsible for proactively enforcing them. In essence, Trading Standards may look into various breaches if they receive complaints. Or they may not, depending on their priorities and the resources they have available. There is a definition of cider in the HMRC regulations, including the proportion of apple required (also quite low), but that's just for tax purposes and, as far as I'm aware, doesn't read across into labelling requirements. I've generally taken the view that, in the UK, even the big producers (such as Bulmers) are unlikely to be using alternative alcohol sources extensively as they have a big - albeit quite industrial - infrastructure devoted to producing/sourcing & fermenting apples/pears so it's doubtful whether there would be a cost advantage in deriving alcohol from other sources. Things may be different for those "producers" focussed on alcopops/RTDs but the number of problematic products is quite small because they generally don't seem to feel the need to present their products as "ciders". As far as the "Scandinavian ciders" in the UK are concerned it may depend on whether they are imported or produced in the UK. In the latter case it seems that some are made differently (i.e. with proper apple ingredients) to those on sale in their home markets. Of course, details of production methods are usually obscure so a degree of discretion by the local admins may be involved. Anyone who is looking for 100% clarity and worldwide consistency is likely to be disappointed. |
2000- 2024 © RateBeer, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service