Yea or nay? Just boil up a simple sugar solution of ~1.040 gravity. |
Nay. Beer yeast is designed to ferment maltose, not sucrose. It can and will live on it, but it won’t be optimum; and the starter made from table sugar may produce yeast that will off-flavor your beer. |
Originally posted by SpringsLicker More important than this, yeast needs the "impurities" that are found in a malt extract. These impurities allow the yeast to multiple, stay healthy and build up there reserves for the fermentation of your beer. Said another way, yeast would have just as much trouble (relatively) fermenting a pure maltose solution as a pure sucrose one. |
Basically, there is no nutrient in table sugar. You’ll end up with mutations and unhealthy yeast. Basically, you’d end up with something you really don’t want in your beer: sick yeast. |
Originally posted by SpringsLicker While this may be true, if the only purpose of a starter is to increase the cell count that you eventually pitch into your wort, then why not use table sugar? It’s not going to produce off-flavors once the yeast start fermenting maltose. Actually, I may try this for my next starter. Can’t believe I haven’t thought of it already. |
Originally posted by absolutesites Once brewers yeast starts feeding on only table sugar, it loses the ability to ferment maltose. You should never use sugar for a starter. Maltose must be the primary food used in yeast propagation, and proper nutrients are also required if you want healthy yeast to be produced, and I think we all do. Malt-based extract is really the only option for yeast propagation. |
It would likely be fine. Yeast just don’t mutate that fast. You probably won’t build up to as high a cell density though. |
From Yeast by White and Zainasheff: Use all-malt wort for starters. The sugar in the starter needs to be maltose, not simple sugar. Yeast grown exclusively on simple sugars stop making the enzyme that enables them to break down maltose. Since brewing wort is mainly maltose, fermenting it with yeast grown on simple sugar results in a beer that will not attenuate properly. |
Originally posted by SamGamgee Ah shit - I forgot about catabolite repression. I know that glucose does this - I wasn’t sure whether the fructose from the sucrose would interfere. I guess that settles it. |
Originally posted by SamGamgee This makes me wonder if this has been tested in the real world or is it just conjecture? Brewing tends to be full of myths that are accepted as science, when it can be proven wrong by real world experimentation. You might not want to do something like this on a repetative basis, but simply making a starter might not be such a problem. |
@asites - that’s why I made my comment above, but I did a quick literature scan and it kind of makes sense. Yeast actively repress the production of secondary metabolic genes in the presence of preferred carbon sources (like glucose and fructose). I’m not sure about how sucrose invertase is regulated, but assuming it’s produced, you would have a crapload of glucose in the system that would downregulate all of the maltose transporters and metabolic genes. They’ll come back on, but I could imagine it being sluggish. |
Homebrew Shops - A collection of homebrew shops and supply houses submitted by RateBeer readers
Homebrewing Articles - RateBeer Magazine's homebrewing department
Homebrew Recipes - Experiment, share and post your own homebrew recipes
2000- 2024 © RateBeer, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service